» Articles » PMID: 33299315

Rehospitalization Risk of Receptor-Affinity Profile in Antipsychotic Drug Treatment: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Japanese Employment-Based Health Insurance Database

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33299315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a difference in the risk of rehospitalization when antipsychotics are classified into two groups treated using drugs with a higher or lower affinity to H1 or α1 receptors than to D2 receptors (histamine H1 receptors, adrenaline α1 receptors [HA] high- and HA low-affinity drug group, respectively) based on affinity to receptors related to sedation using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan.

Patients And Methods: We identified eligible patients by the following two criteria: (i) hospitalization due to schizophrenia (International Classification of Disease [ICD]-10 code: F20 or F25) in psychiatric wards between January 1st, 2005 and August 31st, 2017, and (ii) administration of HA high- or HA low-affinity drugs in the next month after discharge from the earliest hospitalization due to schizophrenia (index month). The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to schizophrenia. The secondary endpoints were (i) involuntary rehospitalization, (ii) concomitant use of anxiolytics/hypnotics, mood stabilizers, and antiparkinsonian drugs, (iii) all-cause death, and (iv) medication discontinuation. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was applied, and the hazard ratio (HR) of the event rate in the HA high-affinity drug group relative to the HA low-affinity drug group was calculated using Cox's proportional hazards model.

Results: Two thousand nine hundred and forty patients were identified as eligible patients. Among PS-matched patients (819 in each group), the HR in the HA high-affinity drug group compared with the HA low-affinity drug group was 1.018 (0.822-1.260, P = 0.870). Other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in the rehospitalization risk due to schizophrenia associated with HA high-affinity antipsychotic drugs. Although this study was a retrospective PS-matched cohort study, the possibility of masking of the rehospitalization risk cannot be excluded because more than 80% of the patients were administered an anxiolytic/hypnotic at the time of admission.

References
1.
Loebel A, Cucchiaro J, Sarma K, Xu L, Hsu C, Kalali A . Efficacy and safety of lurasidone 80 mg/day and 160 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2013; 145(1-3):101-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.009. View

2.
Hatano M, Kamei H, Kato A, Takeuchi I, Hanya M, Uno J . Assessment of the Latent Adverse Events of Antipsychotic Treatment Using a Subjective Questionnaire in Japanese Patients with Schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2017; 15(2):132-137. PMC: 5426495. DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2017.15.2.132. View

3.
MacEwan J, Kamat S, Duffy R, Seabury S, Chou J, Legacy S . Hospital Readmission Rates Among Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Long-Acting Injectables or Oral Antipsychotics. Psychiatr Serv. 2016; 67(11):1183-1188. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500455. View

4.
Velligan D, Sajatovic M, Hatch A, Kramata P, Docherty J . Why do psychiatric patients stop antipsychotic medication? A systematic review of reasons for nonadherence to medication in patients with serious mental illness. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017; 11:449-468. PMC: 5344423. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S124658. View

5.
Orsolini L, Tomasetti C, Valchera A, Vecchiotti R, Matarazzo I, Vellante F . An update of safety of clinically used atypical antipsychotics. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016; 15(10):1329-47. DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1201475. View