» Articles » PMID: 33298988

Development and Validation of a Timely and Representative Finite Element Human Spine Model for Biomechanical Simulations

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33298988
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Numerous spine Finite Element (FE) models have been developed to assess spinal tolerances, spinal loadings and low back pain-related issues. However, justified simplifications, in terms of tissue decomposition and inclusion, for such a complex system may overlook crucial information. Thus, the purpose of this research was to develop and validate a comprehensive and representative spine FE model inclusive of an accurate representation of all major torso elements. A comprehensive model comprised of 273 tissues was developed via a novel FE meshing method to enhance computational feasibility. A comprehensive set of indirect validation tests were carried out to validate every aspect of the model. Under an increasing angular displacement of 24°-41°, the lumbar spine recorded an increasing moment from 5.5 to 9.3 Nm with an increase in IVD pressures from 0.41 to 0.66 MPa. Under forward flexion, vertical vertebral displacements simulated a 6% and 13% maximum discrepancy for intra-abdominal and intramuscular pressure results, all closely resembling previously documented in silico measured values. The developed state-of-the-art model includes most physiological tissues known to contribute to spinal loadings. Given the simulation's accuracy, confirmed by its validation tests, the developed model may serve as a reliable spinal assessment tool.

Citing Articles

Effect of individual spinal muscle activities on upright posture using a human body finite element model.

Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M, Igawa T, Ishii K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3430.

PMID: 39870721 PMC: 11772595. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86788-0.


Development and biomechanical evaluation of a 3D printed analogue of the human lumbar spine.

Dukkipati S, Driscoll M 3D Print Med. 2025; 11(1):3.

PMID: 39843876 PMC: 11755917. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-025-00249-y.


Finite element models of intervertebral disc: recent advances and prospects.

Sun T, Wang J, Liu X, Huang H, Wang J, Suo M Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2453089.

PMID: 39840609 PMC: 11755745. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2453089.


From MRI to FEM: an automated pipeline for biomechanical simulations of vertebrae and intervertebral discs.

Nispel K, Lerchl T, Gruber G, Moeller H, Graf R, Senner V Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1485115.

PMID: 39830685 PMC: 11739884. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1485115.


Biomechanical analysis of spinal cord injury during scoliosis correction surgery.

Wang H, Zhang C, Wang Y, Zeng Y, Chen S, Su X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1399691.

PMID: 39015138 PMC: 11249739. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1399691.


References
1.
Cheung J, Zhang M, Leung A, Fan Y . Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing--a material sensitivity study. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):1045-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.035. View

2.
OSullivan P, Smith A, Beales D, Straker L . Understanding Adolescent Low Back Pain From a Multidimensional Perspective: Implications for Management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 47(10):741-751. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7376. View

3.
Cave A . The Innervation and Morphology of the Cervical Intertransverse Muscles. J Anat. 1937; 71(Pt 4):497-515. PMC: 1252304. View

4.
Fagan M, Julian S, Mohsen A . Finite element analysis in spine research. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002; 216(5):281-98. DOI: 10.1243/09544110260216568. View

5.
Rohlmann A, Burra N, Zander T, Bergmann G . Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(8):1223-31. PMC: 2200767. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0292-8. View