» Articles » PMID: 33297952

Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Mass Segmentation in Mammography

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33297952
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Automatic segmentation and localization of lesions in mammogram (MG) images are challenging even with employing advanced methods such as deep learning (DL) methods. We developed a new model based on the architecture of the semantic segmentation U-Net model to precisely segment mass lesions in MG images. The proposed end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) based model extracts contextual information by combining low-level and high-level features. We trained the proposed model using huge publicly available databases, (CBIS-DDSM, BCDR-01, and INbreast), and a private database from the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC).

Results: We compared the performance of the proposed model with those of the state-of-the-art DL models including the fully convolutional network (FCN), SegNet, Dilated-Net, original U-Net, and Faster R-CNN models and the conventional region growing (RG) method. The proposed Vanilla U-Net model outperforms the Faster R-CNN model significantly in terms of the runtime and the Intersection over Union metric (IOU). Training with digitized film-based and fully digitized MG images, the proposed Vanilla U-Net model achieves a mean test accuracy of 92.6%. The proposed model achieves a mean Dice coefficient index (DI) of 0.951 and a mean IOU of 0.909 that show how close the output segments are to the corresponding lesions in the ground truth maps. Data augmentation has been very effective in our experiments resulting in an increase in the mean DI and the mean IOU from 0.922 to 0.951 and 0.856 to 0.909, respectively.

Conclusions: The proposed Vanilla U-Net based model can be used for precise segmentation of masses in MG images. This is because the segmentation process incorporates more multi-scale spatial context, and captures more local and global context to predict a precise pixel-wise segmentation map of an input full MG image. These detected maps can help radiologists in differentiating benign and malignant lesions depend on the lesion shapes. We show that using transfer learning, introducing augmentation, and modifying the architecture of the original model results in better performance in terms of the mean accuracy, the mean DI, and the mean IOU in detecting mass lesion compared to the other DL and the conventional models.

Citing Articles

Mammography with deep learning for breast cancer detection.

Wang L Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1281922.

PMID: 38410114 PMC: 10894909. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1281922.


Digital mammography dataset for breast cancer diagnosis research (DMID) with breast mass segmentation analysis.

Oza P, Oza U, Oza R, Sharma P, Patel S, Kumar P Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(2):317-330.

PMID: 38374902 PMC: 10874363. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-023-00339-y.


Deep Learning for Medical Image-Based Cancer Diagnosis.

Jiang X, Hu Z, Wang S, Zhang Y Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(14).

PMID: 37509272 PMC: 10377683. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143608.


Artificial intelligence - based ultrasound elastography for disease evaluation - a narrative review.

Zhang X, Wei Q, Wu G, Tang Q, Pan X, Chen G Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1197447.

PMID: 37333814 PMC: 10272784. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197447.


Convolutional Networks and Transformers for Mammography Classification: An Experimental Study.

Cantone M, Marrocco C, Tortorella F, Bria A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772268 PMC: 9921468. DOI: 10.3390/s23031229.


References
1.
Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J . Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016; 39(6):1137-1149. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031. View

2.
Abdelhafiz D, Yang C, Ammar R, Nabavi S . Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(Suppl 11):281. PMC: 6551243. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4. View

3.
Tang J, Rangayyan R, Xu J, El Naqa I, Yang Y . Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009; 13(2):236-51. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2008.2009441. View

4.
Liu J, Chen J, Liu X, Chun L, Tang J, Deng Y . Mass segmentation using a combined method for cancer detection. BMC Syst Biol. 2012; 5 Suppl 3:S6. PMC: 3287574. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-S3-S6. View

5.
Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T . Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016; 39(4):640-651. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683. View