» Articles » PMID: 33296291

Three-dimensional Cephalometric Landmarks Using CBCT for Assessment of Condylar Volume and Surface in Individuals with Class I, II, and III Malocclusions

Overview
Journal Cranio
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33296291
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess volume and surface of the mandibular condyle on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans by comparing Class I, II, and III malocclusions.

Methods: CBCT scans of 55 patients were assessed to measure ANB angle, condyle volume, and surface by using VistaDent software. The values were compared between the different skeletal malocclusions and correlated to gender and sides. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison of malocclusions and Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon test for comparisons of genders and sides. Statistical significance was defined as < 0.05.

Results: There were no significant differences in volume ( = 0.588) and surface ( = 0.830) between the malocclusion classes. The comparison between sides showed a statistically significant difference for surface ( = 0.038).

Conclusion: Condylar volume and surface evaluated on CBCT scans showed no statistically different values for Class I, II, and III malocclusions.

Citing Articles

CBCT analysis of mandibular position and bilateral symmetry in adult female patients with a deep overbite before and after flat bite plate treatment: a retrospective study.

Pang H, Che X Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):551.

PMID: 39548516 PMC: 11568524. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02130-w.


Prevalence of condylar morphological changes in individuals with class II malocclusion.

Oliveira D, Fernandes E, de Castro Lopes S, Rode S, Oliveira W, Ertty E Braz Oral Res. 2024; 38:e060.

PMID: 39016367 PMC: 11376684. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0060.


Comparison of temporomandibular joints in relation to ages and vertical facial types in skeletal class II female patients: a multiple-cross-sectional study.

Zhou J, Yang H, Li Q, Li W, Liu Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):467.

PMID: 38632555 PMC: 11022430. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04219-4.


Volumetric comparison of mandibular condyles and mandibles in the different skeletal classes in the Saudi population.

Marghalani H PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16750.

PMID: 38188155 PMC: 10771761. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16750.


Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of the Mandibular Condylar Volume in Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study in Adult Patients.

Ceratti C, Maspero C, Consonni D, Caprioglio A, Connelly S, Inchingolo F Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(3).

PMID: 35324791 PMC: 8944979. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9030102.