» Articles » PMID: 33296050

Tumor Response Prediction in Y Radioembolization with PET-based Radiomics Features and Absorbed Dose Metrics

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Phys
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33296050
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether lesion radiomics features and absorbed dose metrics extracted from post-therapy Y PET can be integrated to better predict outcomes in microsphere radioembolization of liver malignancies METHODS: Given the noisy nature of Y PET, first, a liver phantom study with repeated acquisitions and varying reconstruction parameters was used to identify a subset of robust radiomics features for the patient analysis. In 36 radioembolization procedures, Y PET/CT was performed within a couple of hours to extract 46 radiomics features and estimate absorbed dose in 105 primary and metastatic liver lesions. Robust radiomics modeling was based on bootstrapped multivariate logistic regression with shrinkage regularization (LASSO) and Cox regression with LASSO. Nested cross-validation and bootstrap resampling were used for optimal parameter/feature selection and for guarding against overfitting risks. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze feature associations. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used for lesion response (at first follow-up) analysis while Kaplan-Meier plots and c-index were used to assess progression model performance. Models with absorbed dose only, radiomics only, and combined models were developed to predict lesion outcome.

Results: The phantom study identified 15/46 reproducible and robust radiomics features that were subsequently used in the patient models. A lesion response model with zone percentage (ZP) and mean absorbed dose achieved an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI 0.702-0.758), and a progression model with zone size nonuniformity (ZSN) and absorbed dose achieved a c-index of 0.803 (95% CI 0.790-0.815) on nested cross-validation (CV). Although the combined models outperformed the radiomics only and absorbed dose only models, statistical significance was not achieved with the current limited data set to establish expected superiority.

Conclusion: We have developed new lesion-level response and progression models using textural radiomics features, derived from Y PET combined with mean absorbed dose for predicting outcome in radioembolization. These encouraging, but limited results, will need further validation in independent and larger datasets prior to any clinical adoption.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Y-90 Radioembolization Treatment Response for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cases Using MRI Radiomics.

Mahmoud M, Lin K, Lee R, Liu C Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2024; 33(3):156-166.

PMID: 39373149 PMC: 11589346. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2024.59365.


Another hammer, but we need a wrench, and a screwdriver-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging represents another tool for post-delivery 90Y dosimetry, but what are we still missing?.

Woodhead G, Young S J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(4):2006-2010.

PMID: 39279923 PMC: 11399844. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-460.


Methodological evaluation of original articles on radiomics and machine learning for outcome prediction based on positron emission tomography (PET).

Rogasch J, Shi K, Kersting D, Seifert R Nuklearmedizin. 2023; 62(6):361-369.

PMID: 37995708 PMC: 10667066. DOI: 10.1055/a-2198-0545.


Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in precision oncology: a review on enhancing discoverability through multiomics integration.

Wei L, Niraula D, Gates E, Fu J, Luo Y, Nyflot M Br J Radiol. 2023; 96(1150):20230211.

PMID: 37660402 PMC: 10546458. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230211.


Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 2, Infradiaphragmatic Cancers, Blood Malignancies, Melanoma and Musculoskeletal Cancers.

Morland D, Triumbari E, Boldrini L, Gatta R, Pizzuto D, Annunziata S Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35741139 PMC: 9222024. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061330.


References
1.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

2.
Dewaraja Y, Devasia T, Kaza R, Mikell J, Owen D, Roberson P . Prediction of Tumor Control in Y Radioembolization by Logit Models with PET/CT-Based Dose Metrics. J Nucl Med. 2019; 61(1):104-111. PMC: 6954459. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226472. View

3.
Ohri N, Duan F, Snyder B, Wei B, Machtay M, Alavi A . Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Textural Features in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(6):842-8. PMC: 4987286. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166934. View

4.
van Timmeren J, Leijenaar R, van Elmpt W, Wang J, Zhang Z, Dekker A . Test-Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?. Tomography. 2018; 2(4):361-365. PMC: 6037932. DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208. View

5.
Kappadath S, Mikell J, Balagopal A, Baladandayuthapani V, Kaseb A, Mahvash A . Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Dose Response After Y-radioembolization With Glass Microspheres Using Y-SPECT/CT-Based Voxel Dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 102(2):451-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.062. View