» Articles » PMID: 33294062

A Key Performance Indicators Redefinition Initiative at a School of Pharmacy Using a Modified Delphi Consensus Technique

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33294062
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school's key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures.

Methods: Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively.

Results: Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success.

Conclusions: Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment.

Citing Articles

Clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital inpatient setting: a systematic review.

Magedanz L, Silva H, Galato D, Fernandez-Llimos F Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(3):602-613.

PMID: 38570475 PMC: 11133179. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01717-x.

References
1.
Powell C . The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 41(4):376-82. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x. View

2.
Salgado T, Fedrigon A, Riccio Omichinski D, Meade M, Farris K . Identifying Medication Management Smartphone App Features Suitable for Young Adults With Developmental Disabilities: Delphi Consensus Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(5):e129. PMC: 5990856. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9527. View

3.
Janke K, Bechtol R, James S, Lepp G, Moote R, Clapp P . Determining Indicators of High-Quality Application Activities for Team-Based Learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019; 83(9):7109. PMC: 6920639. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7109. View

4.
De Villiers M, de Villiers P, Kent A . The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005; 27(7):639-43. DOI: 10.1080/13611260500069947. View

5.
Boutin K, Nevers W, Gorman S, Slavik R, Martinusen D, Lo C . Development of intervention-related quality indicators for renal clinical pharmacists using a modified Delphi approach. Int J Pharm Pract. 2018; 27(5):436-442. DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12484. View