» Articles » PMID: 33293990

The Influence of Solvent, Host, and Phenological Stage on the Yield, Chemical Composition, and Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Properties of (Sprengel) S. Balle

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33293990
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

was reported to possess many biological properties making it a good candidate for the formulation of a phytomedicine with multiple effects. In this work, we studied some factors likely to modify these therapeutic properties with the aim to contribute to its standardization as an improved traditional medicine. parasitizing and were harvested at three phenological stages (vegetative, flowering, and fruiting stages). The extracts were prepared by maceration in n-hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, and distilled water. The total phenolic, flavonoid, flavonol, and tannin contents were measured using appropriate methods. The antioxidant potential of extracts was investigated using TAC, DPPH scavenging, and FRAP methods. The -amylase and -glucosidase inhibitory activities of extracts were determined using enzymatic methods. The ethyl acetate extracts with the best phenolic content were subjected to HPLC analysis. The extraction yields were higher with methanol. The ethyl acetate extract of . harvested from showed a stable HPLC profile during the development of the plant, while extracts from the plant collected from and showed both qualitative and quantitative variations according to phonological stages of the plant. The inhibition of -amylase was more pronounced for harvested from , decreasing during flowering and fruiting, while inhibition of -glucosidase was not influenced by the phenological stage and the host of the plant. The -amylase inhibitors were better extracted by ethyl acetate and those of -glucosidase by ethanol or methanol. The phenolic contents and antioxidant properties of the extracts were influenced by the phenological stage of and its hosts. These results suggest that it is preferable to harvest during flowering or during fruiting stages on any host. None of the used solvents permitted an optimal extraction of active principles form . , suggesting that the mixture of solvents must be considered in further studies.

Citing Articles

Identification of antidiabetic inhibitors from and by targeting α-glucosidase and PPAR-γ: , , and computational evidence.

Azam M, Biswas P, Tareq M, Hossain M, Bibi S, Anisul Hoque M Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 32(1):101884.

PMID: 38090733 PMC: 10711519. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101884.


Response Surface Methodology Applied to the Optimization of the Preparation of Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Extracts from (Spreng.) Balle: Effect of Particle Size, Powder-to-Solvent Ratio, and Temperature.

Feudjio C, Njateng G, Klang M, Yameen M, Khan M, Kuiate J Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:8397250.

PMID: 36091603 PMC: 9458395. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8397250.

References
1.
Bljajic K, Sostaric N, Petlevski R, Vujic L, Brajkovic A, Fumic B . Effect of Betula pendula Leaf Extract on α-Glucosidase and Glutathione Level in Glucose-Induced Oxidative Stress. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016; 2016:8429398. PMC: 5030411. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8429398. View

2.
Luczkiewicz M, Cisowski W, Kaiser P, Ochocka R, Piotrowski A . Comparative analysis of phenolic acids in mistletoe plants from various hosts. Acta Pol Pharm. 2002; 58(5):373-9. View

3.
Nazaruk J, Orlikowski P . Phytochemical profile and therapeutic potential of Viscum album L. Nat Prod Res. 2015; 30(4):373-85. DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1022776. View

4.
Ohikhena F, Wintola O, Afolayan A . Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of (Sprengel) Balle (Loranthaceae), a Mistletoe Growing on Rubber Tree, Using the Dilution Techniques. ScientificWorldJournal. 2017; 2017:9658598. PMC: 5470015. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9658598. View

5.
Do Q, Angkawijaya A, Tran-Nguyen P, Huynh L, Soetaredjo F, Ismadji S . Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J Food Drug Anal. 2017; 22(3):296-302. PMC: 9354875. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2013.11.001. View