» Articles » PMID: 33292099

Accumulation of Dead Cells from Contact Killing Facilitates Coexistence in Bacterial Biofilms

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33292099
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacterial communities are governed by a wide variety of social interactions, some of which are antagonistic with potential significance for bacterial warfare. Several antagonistic mechanisms, such as killing via the type VI secretion system (T6SS), require killer cells to directly contact target cells. The T6SS is hypothesized to be a highly potent weapon, capable of facilitating the invasion and defence of bacterial populations. However, we find that the efficacy of contact killing is severely limited by the material consequences of cell death. Through experiments with strains that kill via the T6SS, we show that dead cell debris quickly accumulates at the interface that forms between competing strains, preventing physical contact and thus preventing killing. While previous experiments have shown that T6SS killing can reduce a population of target cells by as much as 10-fold, we find that, as a result of the formation of dead cell debris barriers, the impact of contact killing depends sensitively on the initial concentration of killer cells. Killer cells are incapable of invading or eliminating competitors on a community level. Instead, bacterial warfare itself can facilitate coexistence between nominally antagonistic strains. While a variety of defensive strategies against microbial warfare exist, the material consequences of cell death provide target cells with their first line of defence.

Citing Articles

The dominant lineage of an emerging pathogen harbours contact-dependent inhibition systems.

Crisan C, Goldberg J Microb Genom. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39853206 PMC: 11893273. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001332.


Spatial constraints and stochastic seeding subvert microbial arms race.

Copeland R, Zhang C, Hammer B, Yunker P PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(1):e1011807.

PMID: 38277405 PMC: 10849242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011807.


Trade-offs constrain adaptive pathways to the type VI secretion system survival.

MacGillivray K, Ng S, Wiesenfeld S, Guest R, Jubery T, Silhavy T iScience. 2023; 26(12):108332.

PMID: 38025790 PMC: 10679819. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108332.


Vertical growth dynamics of biofilms.

Bravo P, Ng S, MacGillivray K, Hammer B, Yunker P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(11):e2214211120.

PMID: 36881625 PMC: 10089195. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214211120.


Type VI Secretion Systems: Environmental and Intra-host Competition of Vibrio cholerae.

Santoriello F, Pukatzki S Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023; 1404:41-63.

PMID: 36792870 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22997-8_3.


References
1.
Coulthurst S . The Type VI secretion system - a widespread and versatile cell targeting system. Res Microbiol. 2013; 164(6):640-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.03.017. View

2.
Majerczyk C, Schneider E, Greenberg E . Quorum sensing control of Type VI secretion factors restricts the proliferation of quorum-sensing mutants. Elife. 2016; 5. PMC: 4868534. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.14712. View

3.
Verster A, Ross B, Radey M, Bao Y, Goodman A, Mougous J . The Landscape of Type VI Secretion across Human Gut Microbiomes Reveals Its Role in Community Composition. Cell Host Microbe. 2017; 22(3):411-419.e4. PMC: 5679258. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.010. View

4.
Bernardy E, Turnsek M, Wilson S, Tarr C, Hammer B . Diversity of Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Vibrio cholerae in Natural Transformation and Contact-Dependent Bacterial Killing Indicative of Type VI Secretion System Activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 82(9):2833-2842. PMC: 4836410. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00351-16. View

5.
Crisan C, Hammer B . The Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system: toxins, regulators and consequences. Environ Microbiol. 2020; 22(10):4112-4122. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14976. View