» Articles » PMID: 33286434

Professional or Amateur? The Phonological Output Buffer As a Working Memory Operator

Overview
Journal Entropy (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Dec 8
PMID 33286434
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Phonological Output Buffer (POB) is thought to be the stage in language production where phonemes are held in working memory and assembled into words. The neural implementation of the POB remains unclear despite a wealth of phenomenological data. Individuals with POB impairment make phonological errors when they produce words and non-words, including phoneme omissions, insertions, transpositions, substitutions and perseverations. Errors can apply to different kinds and sizes of units, such as phonemes, number words, morphological affixes, and function words, and evidence from POB impairments suggests that units tend to substituted with units of the same kind-e.g., numbers with numbers and whole morphological affixes with other affixes. This suggests that different units are processed and stored in the POB in the same stage, but perhaps separately in different mini-stores. Further, similar impairments can affect the buffer used to produce Sign Language, which raises the question of whether it is instantiated in a distinct device with the same design. However, what appear as separate buffers may be distinct regions in the activity space of a single extended POB network, connected with a lexicon network. The self-consistency of this idea can be assessed by studying an autoassociative Potts network, as a model of memory storage distributed over several cortical areas, and testing whether the network can represent both units of word and signs, reflecting the types and patterns of errors made by individuals with POB impairment.

Citing Articles

In poetry, if meter has to help memory, it takes its time.

Andreetta S, Soldatkina O, Boboeva V, Treves A Open Res Eur. 2023; 1:59.

PMID: 37645121 PMC: 10445917. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13663.2.


Letter Migrations between Words in Reading Aloud Can Result either from an Impairment in Orthographic Input or in Phonological Output.

Toledano L, Friedmann N Brain Sci. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37190553 PMC: 10137276. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040588.


Free recall scaling laws and short-term memory effects in a latching attractor network.

Boboeva V, Pezzotta A, Clopath C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(49).

PMID: 34873052 PMC: 8670499. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026092118.


Latching dynamics as a basis for short-term recall.

Ryom K, Boboeva V, Soldatkina O, Treves A PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(9):e1008809.

PMID: 34525090 PMC: 8476040. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008809.


Vowel dyslexia in Turkish: A window to the complex structure of the sublexical route.

Guven S, Friedmann N PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0249016.

PMID: 33760863 PMC: 7990308. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249016.

References
1.
Dell G, SCHWARTZ M, Martin N, Saffran E, Gagnon D . Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(4):801-38. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.4.801. View

2.
Vallar G, Di Betta A, Silveri M . The phonological short-term store-rehearsal system: patterns of impairment and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35(6):795-812. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00127-3. View

3.
Corina D, Poizner H, Bellugi U, Feinberg T, Dowd D . Dissociation between linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural systems: a case for compositionality. Brain Lang. 1992; 43(3):414-47. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(92)90110-z. View

4.
Poizner H, Bellugi U, Tweney R . Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American sign language. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981; 7(5):1146-59. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.5.1146. View

5.
Dotan D, Friedmann N . Steps towards understanding the phonological output buffer and its role in the production of numbers, morphemes, and function words. Cortex. 2014; 63:317-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.014. View