» Articles » PMID: 33285619

Prenatal Ultrasonographic Findings of Esophageal Atresia: Potential Diagnostic Role of the Stomach Shape

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 7
PMID 33285619
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We investigated prenatal sonographic characteristics of esophageal atresia (EA) with advancing gestation. We focused on the degree of polyhydramnios and the stomach shape.

Methods: This study included 27 EA cases (EA group) and 81 idiopathic polyhydramnios cases (non-EA group). The non-EA group consisted of cases without any fetal structural anomaly, musculoskeletal disorder, chromosomal abnormality, or maternal diabetes. Both groups included only singleton pregnancies. Amniotic fluid index (AFI) and width/length (W/L) ratio as well as the product of width and length (W×L) of stomach were serially assessed during gestation and compared between the 2 groups. To predict EA using W/L ratio and W×L, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.

Results: Polyhydramnios was evident in 77.8% of EA cases. We observed 25.9% and 22.2% EA cases with an absent stomach and a small visible stomach, respectively. After 28 weeks, the EA group manifested significantly higher AFI than the non-EA group. After 32 weeks, W/L ratio in the EA group tended to be lower than that in the non-EA group (32-36 weeks: 1.36 vs. 1.72, P=0.092; >36 weeks: 1.43 vs. 1.63, P=0.024). To predict EA, the calculated area under the curve for W/L ratio was 0.651 after 32 weeks. The diagnosis of EA using a cut-off value of W/L ratio <1.376 showed sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio to be 84.6%, 52.9%, 1.796, and 0.081, respectively.

Conclusion: A low W/L ratio of stomach after 32 weeks with progressive idiopathic polyhydramnios may be used to predict EA.

Citing Articles

Polyhydramnios Secondary to Esophageal Atresia - Cervical Cerclage and Serial Amnioreduction to Prolong Gestational Age in Select Cases.

Baey S, Toh Q, Chiang L, Yeo G, Quek B, Laksmi N J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024; 29(3):292-294.

PMID: 38912014 PMC: 11192265. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_259_23.


Prenatal ultrasonic diagnosis of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula combined with interrupted inferior vena cava: a rare case report.

He Y, Song X, Cao Q, Sun H, Chang J, Zhang W J Ultrasound. 2024; .

PMID: 38904735 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-024-00879-8.


The Effect of Vanishing Twin on First- and Second-Trimester Maternal Serum Markers and Nuchal Translucency: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Lee S, Han Y, Kim M, Shim J, Lee M, Oh S J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(38):e300.

PMID: 37750371 PMC: 10519777. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e300.


The effect of a vanishing twin on first- and second-trimester maternal serum markers and ultrasound screening for aneuploidy.

Lee D, Lee S, Lee S Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023; 66(6):477-483.

PMID: 37532226 PMC: 10663394. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.22270.

References
1.
Smith C, Plambeck R, Rayburn W, Albaugh K . Relation of mild idiopathic polyhydramnios to perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79(3):387-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199203000-00012. View

2.
Deurloo J, Ekkelkamp S, Schoorl M, Heij H, Aronson D . Esophageal atresia: historical evolution of management and results in 371 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73(1):267-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03263-5. View

3.
Ethun C, Fallon S, Cassady C, Mehollin-Ray A, Olutoye O, Zamora I . Fetal MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in patients referred to a fetal center for suspected esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49(5):712-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.053. View

4.
Kalache K, Wauer R, Mau H, Chaoui R, Bollmann R . Prognostic significance of the pouch sign in fetuses with prenatally diagnosed esophageal atresia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(4):978-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70357-7. View

5.
Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T . Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4(16):i-vi, 1-193. View