» Articles » PMID: 33284193

The Decline of Salivary Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified As a Tumor Entity: Reclassification Using Contemporary Immunohistochemical Profiling and Diagnostic Criteria

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 7
PMID 33284193
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The classification of salivary gland carcinomas has become increasingly specific over the last decade with the definition of new tumor types, documentation of novel molecular and immunohistochemical findings, and development of more refined diagnostic criteria. In this setting, it is unclear how many salivary tumors still cannot be easily categorized-and whether such tumors represent undifferentiated malignancies or include additional definable entities. Relying largely on current classification schemes and contemporary immunohistochemical panels, we reassessed salivary tumors previously diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (ACA NOS) from 2 large academic medical centers. Fifty-seven ACA NOS (72%) could be reclassified as more specific entities including 31 salivary duct carcinomas (39%), 7 polymorphous adenocarcinomas (9%), 5 epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas (6%), 4 myoepithelial carcinomas (5%), 4 secretory carcinomas (5%), 1 acinic cell carcinoma (1%), 1 basal cell adenocarcinoma (1%), 1 intraductal carcinoma (1%), and 1 clear cell carcinoma (1%) as well as 2 metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (3%). Of reclassified cases, 21 (37%) represented variant histologies within these categories. ACA NOS comprised 11% of salivary malignancies before reclassification, but only 4% after reclassification. The remaining 22 ACA NOS demonstrated heterogeneous features, with an association between histologic grade and clinical outcome. In effect, ACA NOS is becoming a bygone entity as modern classification schemes and ancillary techniques now permit more specific typing of a majority of these tumors, potentially facilitating more specific prognostication and treatment. Additional distinctive entities such as mucinous adenocarcinoma may still be definable within the ACA NOS category.

Citing Articles

Update of newly-recognized salivary gland neoplasms: molecular and immunohistochemical findings and clinical importance.

Wolk R, Cipriani N Histopathology. 2024; 86(2):183-198.

PMID: 39108216 PMC: 11649518. DOI: 10.1111/his.15289.


Recurrence after primary salivary gland carcinoma: Frequency, survival, and risk factors.

Nachtsheim L, Jansen L, Shabli S, Arolt C, Quaas A, Klussmann J Head Neck. 2024; 47(1):47-56.

PMID: 39073241 PMC: 11635748. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27880.


The extent of androgen receptor and HER2 expression allows for targeted therapy in most cases of salivary duct carcinoma: analysis of clinical and histopathological data in a tertiary care center.

Mayer M, Wolber P, Prinz J, Jansen L, Esser J, Shabli S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(7):3779-3789.

PMID: 38587651 PMC: 11211117. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08627-8.


[New information about tumours of the salivary glands : WHO classification 2022].

Ihrler S, Jurmeister P, Haas C, Greber L, Agaimy A Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023; 44(4):214-223.

PMID: 37264269 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-023-01194-5.


[Salivary gland tumors-an overview : Advances in molecular characterization: Part II].

Rupp N, Freiberger S Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023; 44(1):70-77.

PMID: 36622399 PMC: 9877055. DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01171-4.