The Wealth State Awareness Effect on Attention Allocation in People From Impoverished and Affluent Groups

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2020 Dec 7

PMID 33281666

Authors

Shanshan Wang

Dong Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that poverty influences cognitive abilities and that those who have a negative living environment exhibit worse cognitive performance. In addition, eye measures vary following the manipulation of cognitive processing. We examined the distinctive changes in impoverished and affluent persons during tasks that require a high level of concentration using eye-tracking measures. Based on the poverty effect in impoverished people, this study explored how wealth state awareness (WSA) influences them. It was found that the pupillary state indexes of the impoverished participants significantly changed when their WSA was regarding poverty. The results suggest that awareness of poverty may cause impoverished individuals to engage in tasks with more attention allocation and more concentration in the more difficult tasks but that a WSA regarding wealth does not have such effect on them. WSA has no significant effects on their more affluent peers. The findings of this study can contribute to research on WSA effects on impoverished individuals from the perspective of eye measures.

References

Zhou X, Vohs K, Baumeister R . The symbolic power of money: reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(6):700-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02353.x. View

Dionisio D, Granholm E, Hillix W, Perrine W . Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology. 2001; 38(2):205-11. View

Goldwater B . Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychol Bull. 1972; 77(5):340-55. DOI: 10.1037/h0032456. View

Evans G, Schamberg M . Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(16):6545-9. PMC: 2662958. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811910106. View

Vlaskamp B, Hooge I . Crowding degrades saccadic search performance. Vision Res. 2005; 46(3):417-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.006. View

Forssman L, Ashorn P, Ashorn U, Maleta K, Matchado A, Kortekangas E . Eye-tracking-based assessment of cognitive function in low-resource settings. Arch Dis Child. 2016; 102(4):301-302. PMC: 5466915. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310525. View

Vohs K, Mead N, Goode M . The psychological consequences of money. Science. 2006; 314(5802):1154-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1132491. View

Beatty J . Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol Bull. 1982; 91(2):276-92. View

Haushofer J, Fehr E . On the psychology of poverty. Science. 2014; 344(6186):862-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1232491. View

10.

Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J . Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science. 2013; 341(6149):976-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1238041. View

11.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

12.

Alotaibi A, Underwood G, Smith A . Cultural differences in attention: Eye movement evidence from a comparative visual search task. Conscious Cogn. 2017; 55:254-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.002. View

13.

Schutz A, Braun D, Gegenfurtner K . Eye movements and perception: a selective review. J Vis. 2011; 11(5). DOI: 10.1167/11.5.9. View

14.

Nelson 3rd C, Zeanah C, Fox N, Marshall P, Smyke A, Guthrie D . Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Science. 2007; 318(5858):1937-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.1143921. View

15.

Korner C, Gilchrist I . Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychol Res. 2006; 72(1):99-105. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0075-1. View

16.

Wang C, Munoz D . A circuit for pupil orienting responses: implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015; 33:134-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.018. View