» Articles » PMID: 33276586

The Anatomy of the Circle of Willis Is Not a Strong Enough Predictive Factor for the Prognosis of Cross-Clamping Intolerance During Carotid Endarterectomy

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Dec 5
PMID 33276586
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Material And Methods: 40 patients after CEA with CC intolerance were included in Group I, and 15 with CC tolerance in Group II. All patients underwent MRA of the circle of Willis (CoW), P-MR with or without Acetazolamide; P(A)-MR in the postoperative period.

Results: CoW was normal in the MRA in three cases (7.5%) in Group I, and in eight (53%) in Group II. We found P-MR abnormalities in all patients from Group I and in 40% from Group II. Using a calculated cut-off point of 0.322, the patients were classified as CC tolerant with 100% sensitivity or as CC intolerant with 95% specificity. After evaluating P-MR or MRA alone, the percentage of false negative results significantly increased.

Conclusion: The highest value in predicting cross-clamping intolerance is achieved by using analysis of P(A)-MR and MRA of the CoW in combination.

Citing Articles

The Gupta Perioperative Risk for Myocardial Infarct or Cardiac Arrest (MICA) Calculator as an Intraoperative Neurologic Deficit Predictor in Carotid Endarterectomy.

Pereira-Macedo J, Lopes-Fernandes B, Duarte-Gamas L, Pereira-Neves A, Mourao J, Khairy A J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362595 PMC: 9653563. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216367.


Volumetric Flow Assessment in Extracranial Arteries in Patients with 70-99% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Kaszczewski P, Elwertowski M, Leszczynski J, Ostrowski T, Kaszczewska J, Brzezinski T Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140616 PMC: 9497959. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092216.


Intracranial Flow Volume Estimation in Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

Kaszczewski P, Elwertowski M, Leszczynski J, Ostrowski T, Kaszczewska J, Galazka Z Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35328320 PMC: 8947284. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030766.

References
1.
Chongruksut W, Vaniyapong T, Rerkasem K . Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (6):CD000190. PMC: 7032624. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub3. View

2.
Awad N, Choudry R, Durinka J, Prabhu A, Dissin J . Importance of technical preparation of intraarterial shunts to prevent iatrogenic arterial injury during urgent procedures. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013; 47(2):106-8. DOI: 10.1177/1538574412474498. View

3.
Kretz B, Abello N, Bouchot O, Kazandjian C, Beaumont M, Terriat B . Risk index for predicting shunt in carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 28(5):1204-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.09.011. View

4.
Naylor A, Ricco J, de Borst G, Debus S, De Haro J, Halliday A . Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 55(1):3-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. View

5.
Ballotta E, Saladini M, Gruppo M, Mazzalai F, Da Giau G, Baracchini C . Predictors of electroencephalographic changes needing shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010; 24(8):1045-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.06.005. View