» Articles » PMID: 33273618

Asymmetric Practices of Reading and Writing Shape Visuospatial Attention and Discrimination

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Dec 4
PMID 33273618
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Movement is generally conceived of as unfolding laterally in the writing direction that one is socialized into. In 'Western' languages, this is a left-to-right bias contributing to an imbalance in how attention is distributed across space. We propose that the rightward attentional bias exercises an additional unidirectional influence on discrimination performance thus shaping the congruency effect typically observed in Posner-inspired cueing tasks. In two studies, we test whether faces averted laterally serve as attention orienting cues and generate differences in both target discrimination latencies and gaze movements across left and right hemifields. Results systematically show that right-facing faces (i.e. aligned with the script direction) give rise to an advantage for cue-target pairs pertaining to the right (versus left) side of space. We report an asymmetry between congruent conditions in the form of right-sided facilitation for: (a) response time in discrimination decisions (experiment 1-2) and (b) eye-gaze movements, namely earlier onset to first fixation in the respective region of interest (experiment 2). Left and front facing cues generated virtually equal exploration patterns, confirming that the latter did not prime any directionality. These findings demonstrate that visuospatial attention and consequent discrimination are highly dependent on the asymmetric practices of reading and writing.

Citing Articles

Gazing left, gazing right: exploring a spatial bias in social attention.

Dalmaso M, Fedrigo G, Vicovaro M PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15694.

PMID: 37456887 PMC: 10349552. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15694.


Hemispheric functional segregation facilitates target detection during sustained visuospatial attention.

DiNuzzo M, Mascali D, Bussu G, Moraschi M, Guidi M, Macaluso E Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(15):4529-4539.

PMID: 35695003 PMC: 9491284. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25970.

References
1.
Langton , Watt , Bruce I . Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(2):50-59. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9. View

2.
Smith A, Elias L . Native reading direction and corresponding preferences for left- or right-lit images. Percept Mot Skills. 2013; 116(2):355-67. DOI: 10.2466/23.24.PMS.116.2.355-367. View

3.
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Funes M, Lupianez J . Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 36(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1037/a0017176. View

4.
Roman A, Flumini A, Lizano P, Escobar M, Santiago J . Reading direction causes spatial biases in mental model construction in language understanding. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:18248. PMC: 4678875. DOI: 10.1038/srep18248. View

5.
Shaki S, Fischer M, Petrusic W . Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(2):328-31. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328. View