» Articles » PMID: 33272859

Racial/ethnic Disparities in Measure Calculations for Part D Star Ratings Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Diabetes, Hypertension, And/or Hyperlipidemia

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pharmacy
Date 2020 Dec 4
PMID 33272859
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous literature reported racial/ethnic disparities in the measure assessment of diabetes medication adherence in the Medicare Part D Star Ratings program.

Objective: This study examined the likelihood of inclusion in measure calculation across racial/ethnic groups for adherence metrics in Part D Star Ratings among individuals with diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross sectional analysis of a 10% random sample of 2017 Medicare claims linked to Area Health Resources Files. Inclusion in measure calculation was determined based on inclusion/exclusion criteria in adherence metrics for adherence medications for diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in Part D Star Ratings developed by the Pharmacy Quality Alliance. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression were used to adjust for patient/community characteristics.

Results: The study sample size was 2 707 216. Compared to Non-Hispanic White (White) beneficiaries, minorities were more likely to be excluded from measure calculation among individuals with 1 condition. For example, among individuals with hypertension, compared to White individuals, the adjusted odds ratios for exclusion for Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander and other individuals were 1.46 (95% confidence interval, or CI = 1.42-1.50), 1.38 (95% CI = 1.33-1.43), 1.28 (95% CI = 1.21-1.35), and 1.08 (95% CI = 1.02-1.15), respectively. Among individuals with more than 1 chronic condition, minorities were more likely to be included in fewer calculations for medication adherence measures. For example, among individuals with all 3 conditions, the adjusted relative risk ratios for Black, compared to White, beneficiaries for being included in 0, 1, and 2 measures, versus all 3 measures, were 2.14 (95% CI = 1.99-2.30), 1.49 (95% CI = 1.41-1.56), 1.20 (95% CI = 1.18-1.23), respectively.

Conclusions: Compared to White beneficiaries, racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to be excluded from the calculation for adherence measures among individuals with diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. Future studies should examine whether such disparities exacerbate existing racial/ethnic disparities in health outcomes and devise solutions for these disparities.

Citing Articles

Barriers to person-centered service design in pharmacy practice: examples, lessons, and potential solutions.

Murry L, Desselle S Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(2):542-547.

PMID: 38194008 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01689-4.


Solving racial/ethnic disparities associated with Medicare Part D Star Ratings.

Dong X, Tsang C, Browning J, Sim Y, Wan J, Chisholm-Burns M Curr Med Res Opin. 2023; 39(7):963-971.

PMID: 37219396 PMC: 10423313. DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2217654.


Effects of Part D Star Ratings on racial and ethnic disparities in health care costs.

Tsang C, Sim Y, Christensen M, Wang J Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023; 9:100250.

PMID: 37091627 PMC: 10113890. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100250.


Racial and ethnic disparities due to Medicare Part D Star Ratings criteria among kidney transplant patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia.

Chisholm-Burns M, Spivey C, Tsang C, Wang J J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022; 28(6):688-699.

PMID: 35621720 PMC: 9499736. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.6.688.


Bayes Conditional Probability-Based Causation Analysis between Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension (PIH): A Statistic Case Study in Harbin, China.

Diao D, Diao F, Xiao B, Liu N, Zheng D, Li F J Diabetes Res. 2022; 2022:2590415.

PMID: 35493606 PMC: 9054448. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2590415.