» Articles » PMID: 33272825

Towards Automated Extraction of 2D Standard Fetal Head Planes from 3D Ultrasound Acquisitions: A Clinical Evaluation and Quality Assessment Comparison

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Dec 4
PMID 33272825
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Clinical evaluation of deep learning (DL) tools is essential to compliment technical accuracy metrics. This study assessed the image quality of standard fetal head planes automatically-extracted from three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound fetal head volumes using a customised DL-algorithm.

Methods: Two observers retrospectively reviewed standard fetal head planes against pre-defined image quality criteria. Forty-eight images (29 transventricular, 19 transcerebellar) were selected from 91 transabdominal fetal scans (mean gestational age = 26 completed weeks, range = 20-32 weeks). Each had two-dimensional (2D) manually-acquired (2D-MA), 3D operator-selected (3D-OS) and 3D-DL automatically-acquired (3D-DL) images. The proportion of adequate images from each plane and modality, and the number of inadequate images per plane was compared for each method. Inter and intra-observer agreement of overall image quality was calculated.

Results: Sixty-seven percent of 3D-OS and 3D-DL transventricular planes were adequate quality. Forty-five percent of 3D-OS and 55% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes were adequate. Seventy-one percent of 3D-OS and 86% of 3D-DL transventricular planes failed with poor visualisation of intra-cranial structures. Eighty-six percent of 3D-OS and 80% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes failed due to inadequate visualisation of cerebellar hemispheres. Image quality was significantly different between 2D and 3D, however, no significant difference between 3D-modalities was demonstrated (p < 0.005). Inter-observer agreement of transventricular plane adequacy was moderate for both 3D-modalities, and weak for transcerebellar planes.

Conclusion: The 3D-DL algorithm can automatically extract standard fetal head planes from 3D-head volumes of comparable quality to operator-selected planes. Image quality in 3D is inferior to corresponding 2D planes, likely due to limitations with 3D-technology and acquisition technique.

Implications For Practice: Automated image extraction of standard planes from US-volumes could facilitate use of 3DUS in clinical practice, however image quality is dependent on the volume acquisition technique.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Fetal Neurosonography: A Comprehensive Review.

Weichert J, Scharf J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39337113 PMC: 11432922. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185626.


Does matrix transducer technology improve quality and repeatability of four-dimensional tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and mitral annular plane systolic excursion measurements?.

Thomas S, Erenbourg A, Chang M, Ferreira A, Stevenson G, Welsh A Ultrasound. 2024; 32(2):103-113.

PMID: 38694827 PMC: 11060120. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X231215501.


Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Jost E, Kosian P, Jimenez Cruz J, Albarqouni S, Gembruch U, Strizek B J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959298 PMC: 10649694. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216833.


Development of a Machine Learning Model for Sonographic Assessment of Gestational Age.

Lee C, Willis A, Chen C, Sieniek M, Watters A, Stetson B JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(1):e2248685.

PMID: 36598790 PMC: 9857195. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48685.

References
1.
Jaudi S, Tezenas Du Montcel S, Fries N, Nizard J, Desfontaines V, Dommergues M . Online evaluation of fetal second-trimester four-chamber view images: a comparison of six evaluation methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38(2):185-90. DOI: 10.1002/uog.8941. View

2.
DallAsta A, Paramasivam G, Basheer S, Whitby E, Tahir Z, Lees C . How to obtain diagnostic planes of the fetal central nervous system using three-dimensional ultrasound and a context-preserving rendering technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 220(3):215-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1088. View

3.
Ville Y . 'Ceci n'est pas une échographie': a plea for quality assessment in prenatal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 31(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5248. View

4.
Salomon L, Bernard J, Duyme M, Doris B, Mas N, Ville Y . Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 27(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2665. View

5.
Fratelli N, Taddei F, Prefumo F, Franceschetti L, Farina G, Frusca T . Interobserver reproducibility of transabdominal 3-dimensional sonography of the fetal brain. J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 28(8):1009-13. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.8.1009. View