» Articles » PMID: 33264741

Amplitude Based Segmentation of Ultrasound Echoes for Attenuation Coefficient Estimation

Overview
Journal Ultrasonics
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33264741
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vivo ultrasound attenuation coefficient measurements are of interest as they can provide insight into tissue pathology. They are also needed so that measurements of the tissue's frequency dependent ultrasound backscattering coefficient may be corrected for attenuation. In vivo measurements of the attenuation coefficient are challenging because it has to be estimated from the depth dependent decay of backscatter signals that display a large degree of magnitude variation. In this study we describe and evaluate an improved backscatter method to estimate ultrasound attenuation which is tolerant to the presence of some backscatter inhomogeneity. This employs an automated algorithm to segment and remove atypically strong echoes to lessen the potential bias these may introduce on the attenuation coefficient estimates. The benefit of the algorithm was evaluated by measuring the frequency dependent attenuation coefficient of a gelatine phantom containing randomly distributed cellulose scatterers as a homogeneous backscattering component and planar pieces of cooked leek to provide backscattering inhomogeneities. In the phantom the segmentation algorithm was found to improve the accuracy and precision of attenuation coefficient estimates by up to 80% and 90%, respectively. The effect of the algorithm was then measured invivo using 32 radiofrequency B-mode datasets from the breasts of two healthy female volunteers, producing a 5 to 25% reduction in mean attenuation coefficient estimates and a 30 to 50% reduction in standard deviation of attenuation coefficient across different positions within each breast. The results suggest that the segmentation algorithm may improve the accuracy and precision of attenuation coefficient estimates invivo.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances in Attenuation Estimation.

Rosado-Mendez I Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023; 1403:85-104.

PMID: 37495916 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21987-0_6.

References
1.
Cloostermans M, Thijssen J . A beam corrected estimation of the frequency dependent attenuation of biological tissues from backscattered ultrasound. Ultrason Imaging. 1983; 5(2):136-47. DOI: 10.1177/016173468300500203. View

2.
Parker K, Lerner R, Waag R . Attenuation of ultrasound: magnitude and frequency dependence for tissue characterization. Radiology. 1984; 153(3):785-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.153.3.6387795. View

3.
Labyed Y, Bigelow T . A theoretical comparison of attenuation measurement techniques from backscattered ultrasound echoes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 129(4):2316-24. PMC: 3087399. DOI: 10.1121/1.3559677. View

4.
Nam K, Zagzebski J, Hall T . Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter. Ultrason Imaging. 2013; 35(2):146-61. PMC: 3676873. DOI: 10.1177/0161734613480281. View

5.
Rubert N, Varghese T . Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40(7):1680-96. PMC: 4178544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.01.022. View