» Articles » PMID: 33262945

The Organ Trail: A Review of Biomarkers of Organ Failure

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33262945
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pediatric organ failure and transplant populations face significant risks of morbidity and mortality. The risk of organ failure itself may be disproportionately higher among pediatric oncology patients, as cancer may originate within and/or metastasize to organs and adversely affect their function. Additionally, cancer directed therapies are frequently toxic to organs and may contribute to failure. Recent reports suggest that nearly half of providers find it difficult to provide prognostic information regarding organ failure due to unknown disease trajectories. Unfortunately, there is a lack of uniform methodology in detecting the early symptoms of organ failure, which may delay diagnosis, initiation of treatment and hinder prognostic planning. There remains a wide array of outstanding scientific questions regarding organ failure in pediatrics but emerging data may change the landscape of prognostication. Liquid biopsy, in which disease biomarkers are detected in bodily fluids, offers a noninvasive alternative to tissue biopsy and may improve prompt detection of organ failure and prognostication. Here, we review potential liquid biopsy biomarkers for organ failure, which may be particularly useful among pediatric oncology patients. We synthesized information from publications obtained on PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science and categorized our findings based on the type of biomarker used to detect organ failure. We highlight the advantages and disadvantages specific to each type of organ failure biomarker. While much work needs to be done to advance this field and validate its applicability to pediatric cancer patients facing critical care complications, herein, we highlight promising areas for future discovery.

Citing Articles

Development and assessment of a mortality risk prediction nomogram model for pneumocystis disease in ICU within 28 days.

Weng Y, Zhou T, Ye H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2410.

PMID: 39827208 PMC: 11742898. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86696-3.


The relation between inflammatory biomarkers and drug pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patients: a scoping review.

Li L, Zinger J, Sassen S, Juffermans N, Koch B, Endeman H Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):376.

PMID: 39563441 PMC: 11577668. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05150-4.

References
1.
Timmermans K, Kox M, Scheffer G, Pickkers P . Plasma Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Levels, and Markers of Inflammation, Shock, and Organ Damage in Patients with Septic Shock. Shock. 2015; 45(6):607-12. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000549. View

2.
Bauden M, Pamart D, Ansari D, Herzog M, Eccleston M, Micallef J . Circulating nucleosomes as epigenetic biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2015; 7:106. PMC: 4597435. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-015-0139-4. View

3.
Jin X, Chen Y, Chen H, Fei S, Chen D, Cai X . Evaluation of Tumor-Derived Exosomal miRNA as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(17):5311-5319. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0577. View

4.
Bartel D . MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009; 136(2):215-33. PMC: 3794896. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. View

5.
Ozkok A, Yildiz A . Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Kidney Diseases. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018; 43(3):701-718. DOI: 10.1159/000489745. View