» Articles » PMID: 33260716

Replacing Forage by Crude Olive Cake in a Dairy Sheep Diet: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Populations in Rusitec Fermenters

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2020 Dec 2
PMID 33260716
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Olive oil extraction generates large amounts of a highly pollutant by-product called olive cake (OC), and its use in ruminant feeding could be an alternative. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of partially replacing forage by crude OC (COC) in a mixed dairy diet on rumen fermentation and microbial populations in Rusitec fermenters. The COC replaced 33% of the forage (66% maize silage and 33% barley straw) and was included at 16.6% of the total diet. Four fermenters were used in a cross-over design with two 13-day incubation periods. Experimental diets had a 50:50 forage-to-concentrate ratio and were formulated to contain the same protein (16.0%) and neutral detergent fiber (32.5%) levels. Compared with control fermenters, those fed the COC diet showed greater ( 0.02) pH (6.07 vs. 6.22), diet disappearance (0.709 vs. 0.748), and butyrate proportions (18.0 vs. 19.4), but there were no differences in volatile fatty acids and ammonia production. Microbial growth, bacterial diversity, protozoal abundance, and relative abundance of fungi and archaea were unaffected by diet, although the solid phase of COC-fed fermenters showed greater ( = 0.01) bacterial abundance than control ones. Results indicate that COC could replace 33% of the forage in a mixed dairy diet.

Citing Articles

Dietary inclusion of olive cake alone or in combination with in Black goat kids: Implications for performance and health.

Obeidat B, Al-Khazaleh J, Thomas M, Obeidat M, Nusairat B Vet World. 2025; 17(11):2497-2505.

PMID: 39829653 PMC: 11736364. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.2497-2505.


The Dietary Inclusion of Ensiled Olive Cake Increases Unsaturated Lipids in Milk and Alters the Expression of Lipogenic Genes in Mammary and Adipose Tissue in Goats.

Neofytou M, Hager-Theodorides A, Sfakianaki E, Simitzis P, Symeou S, Sparaggis D Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958173 PMC: 10650401. DOI: 10.3390/ani13213418.


Effect of olive and date palm by-products on rumen methanogenic community in Barki sheep.

Rabee A, Kewan K, El Shaer H, Lamara M, Sabra E AIMS Microbiol. 2022; 8(1):26-41.

PMID: 35496986 PMC: 8995188. DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2022003.


Effect of barley straw and Egyptian clover hay on the rumen fermentation and structure and fibrolytic activities of rumen bacteria in dromedary camel.

Rabee A Vet World. 2022; 15(1):35-45.

PMID: 35369587 PMC: 8924375. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.35-45.


Rumen bacterial community profile and fermentation in Barki sheep fed olive cake and date palm byproducts.

Rabee A, Kewan K, Sabra E, El Shaer H, Lamara M PeerJ. 2021; 9:e12447.

PMID: 34820187 PMC: 8605757. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12447.


References
1.
Mannelli F, Cappucci A, Pini F, Pastorelli R, Decorosi F, Giovannetti L . Effect of different types of olive oil pomace dietary supplementation on the rumen microbial community profile in Comisana ewes. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):8455. PMC: 5981327. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26713-w. View

2.
Satter L, Slyter L . Effect of ammonia concentration of rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br J Nutr. 1974; 32(2):199-208. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19740073. View

3.
Yu Z, Morrison M . Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques. 2004; 36(5):808-12. DOI: 10.2144/04365ST04. View

4.
Saro C, Ranilla M, Cifuentes A, Rossello-Mora R, Carro M . Technical note: Comparison of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92(3):1083-8. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7175. View

5.
Marcos C, Garcia-Rebollar P, de Blas C, Carro M . Variability in the Chemical Composition and In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation of Olive Cake By-Products. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(3). PMC: 6466253. DOI: 10.3390/ani9030109. View