» Articles » PMID: 33258478

Harmonized Definition of Occupational Burnout: A Systematic Review, Semantic Analysis, and Delphi Consensus in 29 Countries

Abstract

Objective A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET). Methods First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition. Results We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists` comments as follows: "In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems". A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it. Conclusion This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.

Citing Articles

Mitigating burnout and suicidal ideation in the Brazilian health care workforce: the role of workplace support during COVID-19.

Moser C, Tietbohl-Santos B, Bassols A, Laskoski P, Hauck S Rev Bras Med Trab. 2025; 22(4):e20241290.

PMID: 39958416 PMC: 11822980. DOI: 10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1290.


Burnout and organisational stressors among healthcare staff working with adults with intellectual disabilities in Ireland.

Clancy P, Cassarino M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313767.

PMID: 39874311 PMC: 11774381. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313767.


Correlation of Burnout Syndrome with Emotional Intelligence among Clinicians at Workplace.

Badshah A, Yousaf A, Mehboob U, Khan M Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(1):83-89.

PMID: 39867794 PMC: 11755295. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.9725.


Covid-19 pandemic-related changes in teleworking, emotional exhaustion, and occupational burnout: a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study.

Uppal A, Pullen N, Baysson H, Schrempft S, Bouhet A, Zaballa M BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):282.

PMID: 39849408 PMC: 11756113. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21142-z.


Temporal Stages of Burnout: How to Design Prevention?.

Leclercq C, Hansez I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767459 PMC: 11675960. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121617.


References
1.
Guseva Canu I, Mesot O, Gyorkos C, Mediouni Z, Mehlum I, Bugge M . Burnout syndrome in Europe: towards a harmonized approach in occupational health practice and research. Ind Health. 2019; 57(6):745-752. PMC: 6885602. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0159. View

2.
Shahpori R, Doig C . Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms direction and its implications on critical care. J Crit Care. 2009; 25(2):364.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.08.008. View

3.
Millar J . The Need for a Global Language - SNOMED CT Introduction. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 225:683-5. View

4.
Rodrigues H, Cobucci R, Oliveira A, Cabral J, Medeiros L, Gurgel K . Burnout syndrome among medical residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0206840. PMC: 6231624. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206840. View

5.
Demerouti E, Bakker A, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli W . The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001; 86(3):499-512. View