» Articles » PMID: 33255715

Metagenomics-Based Proficiency Test of Smoked Salmon Spiked with a Mock Community

Abstract

An inter-laboratory proficiency test was organized to assess the ability of participants to perform shotgun metagenomic sequencing of cold smoked salmon, experimentally spiked with a mock community composed of six bacteria, one parasite, one yeast, one DNA, and two RNA viruses. Each participant applied its in-house wet-lab workflow(s) to obtain the metagenomic dataset(s), which were then collected and analyzed using MG-RAST. A total of 27 datasets were analyzed. Sample pre-processing, DNA extraction protocol, library preparation kit, and sequencing platform, influenced the abundance of specific microorganisms of the mock community. Our results highlight that despite differences in wet-lab protocols, the reads corresponding to the mock community members spiked in the cold smoked salmon, were both detected and quantified in terms of relative abundance, in the metagenomic datasets, proving the suitability of shotgun metagenomic sequencing as a genomic tool to detect microorganisms belonging to different domains in the same food matrix. The implementation of standardized wet-lab protocols would highly facilitate the comparability of shotgun metagenomic sequencing dataset across laboratories and sectors. Moreover, there is a need for clearly defining a sequencing reads threshold, to consider pathogens as detected or undetected in a food sample.

Citing Articles

Monitoring and preventing foodborne outbreaks: are we missing wastewater as a key data source?.

Troja F, Indio V, Savini F, Seguino A, Serraino A, Fuschi A Ital J Food Saf. 2025; 13(4):12725.

PMID: 39749179 PMC: 11694617. DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2024.12725.


An interlaboratory proficiency test using metagenomic sequencing as a diagnostic tool for the detection of RNA viruses in swine fecal material.

Liu L, Hakhverdyan M, Wallgren P, Vanneste K, Fu Q, Lucas P Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(10):e0420823.

PMID: 39162509 PMC: 11448438. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04208-23.


Enhancing Clinical Utility: Utilization of International Standards and Guidelines for Metagenomic Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis.

Kan C, Tsang H, Pei X, Ng S, Yim A, Yu A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542307 PMC: 10970082. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063333.


One Health surveillance-A cross-sectoral detection, characterization, and notification of foodborne pathogens.

Tast Lahti E, Karamehmedovic N, Riedel H, Blom L, Boel J, Delibato E Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1129083.

PMID: 36969662 PMC: 10034719. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129083.


Application of a strain-level shotgun metagenomics approach on food samples: resolution of the source of a food-borne outbreak.

Buytaers F, Saltykova A, Mattheus W, Verhaegen B, Roosens N, Vanneste K Microb Genom. 2021; 7(4).

PMID: 33826490 PMC: 8208685. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000547.

References
1.
Kirstahler P, Solborg Bjerrum S, Friis-Moller A, La Cour M, Aarestrup F, Westh H . Genomics-Based Identification of Microorganisms in Human Ocular Body Fluid. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4126. PMC: 5841358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22416-4. View

2.
Aw T, Wengert S, Rose J . Metagenomic analysis of viruses associated with field-grown and retail lettuce identifies human and animal viruses. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016; 223:50-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.02.008. View

3.
McMurdie P, Holmes S . phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61217. PMC: 3632530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. View

4.
Jones M, Highlander S, Anderson E, Li W, Dayrit M, Klitgord N . Library preparation methodology can influence genomic and functional predictions in human microbiome research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(45):14024-9. PMC: 4653211. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519288112. View

5.
Ottesen A, Ramachandran P, Reed E, White J, Hasan N, Subramanian P . Enrichment dynamics of Listeria monocytogenes and the associated microbiome from naturally contaminated ice cream linked to a listeriosis outbreak. BMC Microbiol. 2016; 16(1):275. PMC: 5112668. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0894-1. View