» Articles » PMID: 33254319

[Assessment of Speech Perception and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implant in Postlingual Deaf Adults]

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 30
PMID 33254319
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study is aimed to evaluate impacts of cochlear implantation on speech perception and quality of life in postlingual deaf adults, and to explore the correlation between speech perception and quality of life using Nijimegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire and Mandarin version of Minimum Speech Test Battery. Thirty-six postlingual deafpatients were recruited, including 20 males and 16 females. Patient age was 20 to 72 years old(52±16) when CI was implanted, and the hearing loss duration was 2 to 25 years(14±6) before cochlear implantation. The single syllable recognition rate score were tested by using Mandarin version of Minimum Speech Test Battery, and the quantify quality of life was tested by using Nijimegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire. Speech recognition and quality of life have significantly improved in patients with CI after cochlear implantiont. The scores of basic sound perception, advanced sound perception, speech ability, self-confidence, social activity ability, and social ability have improved, but the differences were not statistically significant. The Mandrin single-syllable recognition rate scores were related to basic sound perception(=-0.36; =0.004), advanced sound perception(=-0.41; =0.002), and speech ability(=-0.67; =0.001), and the differences are statistically significant. The postlingual deafnesses ability of auditory, speech perception and the quality of life have improved significantly in patients with CI after cochlear implantiont.

Citing Articles

[Effect of cochlear implantation on speech recognition under different listening modes in children].

Du H, Jiang Y, Yang Y, Gao J, Lu L, Zhang X Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 37(3):201-205.

PMID: 36843519 PMC: 10320668. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.03.009.


[Correlation between Mandarin acceptable noise level and cortical auditory evoked potential in young normal-hearing listeners].

Chen J, Zhu H, Shen J, Ma X, Wang W, Sun J Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022; 36(9):679-684.

PMID: 36036068 PMC: 10127622. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.09.006.


[Compensation effect of hearing aid on speech recognition in noise in patients with unilateral hearing loss].

Sun J, Zhu D, Wang L, Mei L, Chen J, Wang W Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022; 36(8):571-575.

PMID: 35959572 PMC: 10128199. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.08.001.

References
1.
Dong R, Liu B, Peng X, Chen X, Gong S . [Analysis of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010; 45(10):818-23. View

2.
Hinderink J, Krabbe P, Van Den Broek P . Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123(6):756-65. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.108203. View

3.
Rumeau C, Frere J, Montaut-Verient B, Lion A, Gauchard G, Parietti-Winkler C . Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 272(12):3685-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x. View

4.
Olze H, Grabel S, Forster U, Zirke N, Huhnd L, Haupt H . Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope. 2011; 122(1):196-203. DOI: 10.1002/lary.22356. View

5.
Luxford W . Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 124(2):125-6. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.113035. View