» Articles » PMID: 33252870

A Randomized Trial of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Nov 30
PMID 33252870
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Face-mask ventilation is the most common resuscitation method for birth asphyxia. Ventilation with a cuffless laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has potential advantages over face-mask ventilation during neonatal resuscitation in low-income countries, but whether the use of an LMA reduces mortality and morbidity among neonates with asphyxia is unknown.

Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, superiority trial in Uganda, we randomly assigned neonates who required positive-pressure ventilation to be treated by a midwife with an LMA or with face-mask ventilation. All the neonates had an estimated gestational age of at least 34 weeks, an estimated birth weight of at least 2000 g, or both. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 7 days or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy at day 1 to 5 during hospitalization.

Results: Complete follow-up data were available for 99.2% of the neonates. A primary outcome event occurred in 154 of 563 neonates (27.4%) in the LMA group and 144 of 591 (24.4%) in the face-mask group (adjusted relative risk, 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.51; P = 0.26). Death within 7 days occurred in 21.7% of the neonates in the LMA group and 18.4% of those in the face-mask group (adjusted relative risk, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.63), and admission to the NICU with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy at day 1 to 5 during hospitalization occurred in 11.2% and 10.1%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.93). Findings were materially unchanged in a sensitivity analysis in which neonates with missing data were counted as having had a primary outcome event in the LMA group and as not having had such an event in the face-mask group. The frequency of predefined intervention-related adverse events was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: In neonates with asphyxia, the LMA was safe in the hands of midwives but was not superior to face-mask ventilation with respect to early neonatal death and moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. (Funded by the Research Council of Norway and the Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health; NeoSupra ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03133572.).

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of endotracheal versus supraglottic airway epinephrine in a healthy neonatal piglet model.

Ramsie M, Cheung P, Lee T, OReilly M, Schmolzer G Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40038459 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03960-y.


Midwives' knowledge and perspectives on neonatal resuscitation and survival before and after Helping Babies Breathe training: a qualitative study in Uganda.

Myrnerts Hook S, Abrahamsson M, Namusoko S, Byamugisha J, Bergstrom A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e094012.

PMID: 39920044 PMC: 11808869. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094012.


Supraglottic airway in neonatal porcine model.

Gibbs R, Ramsie M, OReilly M, Lee T, Schmolzer G Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39837993 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03879-4.


Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies.

Trevisanuto D, Gizzi C, Cavallin F, Beke A, Buonocore G, Charitou A Neonatology. 2024; 121(6):780-790.

PMID: 38834044 PMC: 11633884. DOI: 10.1159/000538808.


Dependence of Successful Airway Management in Neonatal Simulation Manikins on the Type of Supraglottic Airway Device and Providers' Backgrounds.

Sugiura T, Urushibata R, Fukaya S, Shioda T, Fukuoka T, Iwata O Children (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790524 PMC: 11119467. DOI: 10.3390/children11050530.