» Articles » PMID: 33248571

Effects of Methylsulfonylmethane and Neutralizing Anti-IL-10 Antibody Supplementation During a Mild Eimeria Challenge Infection in Broiler Chickens

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Nov 29
PMID 33248571
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A 28-day experiment was conducted in broilers to study the effects of feeding methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and IL-10-neutralizing antibody from dried egg product (DEP) on the growth performance, immune responsivity, oxidative stress parameters, and gut health outcomes during a mild infection with mixed species of Eimeria. A total of 500 male Ross 308 chicks were allocated to five treatments: sham-inoculated (uninfected) chickens fed control diet (UCON), Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet (ICON), and Eimeria-infected chickens fed control diet supplemented with 287 U/tonne of DEP (I-DEP), 0.4% MSM, or their combination (I-DEP-MSM), with 10 replicate cages of 10 birds per treatment. All infected groups received 1 mL of an oral inoculum containing Eimeria acervulina (10,000 oocysts), Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts), and Eimeria tenella (5,000 oocysts) on study days 7 and 14. Data were analyzed as a two-way ANOVA for all treatments including Eimeria-infected groups, in addition to a single degree of freedom contrast to compare uninfected and infected groups receiving the control diet. Mild Eimeria infection did not influence the growth performance in ICON compared with UCON at any time points. Overall (day 0-28) growth performance parameters were not influenced by either infection or dietary supplementation of MSM or DEP. However, birds in I-DEP-MSM showed improved ADG during study day 7 to 14 (i.e., 7 d after primary inoculation) indicating a beneficial effect immediately after Eimeria infection. Although MSM supplementation reduced thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (day 21 and 28), both MSM and DEP improved the total antioxidant capacity (day 21) in the plasma of infected birds. Histopathological outcomes were not influenced by treatments, and fecal oocyst output was higher in MSM- and DEP-supplemented groups than with ICON, indicating no beneficial effects. Similarly, expression of cecal inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β, and interferon-γ) was not affected by MSM, DEP, or their combination. Overall, the current results suggest that both MSM and DEP supplementation may benefit birds during a mild Eimeria infection as indicated by improvements in ADG and oxidative stress outcomes.

Citing Articles

Role of Dietary Methyl Sulfonyl Methane in Poultry.

Kim Y, Lee K Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766239 PMC: 9913537. DOI: 10.3390/ani13030351.


Dietary supplementation of sulfur amino acids improves intestinal immunity to in broilers treated with anti-interleukin-10 antibody.

Ren Z, Yan J, Whelan R, Liao X, Butz D, Arendt M Anim Nutr. 2022; 10:382-389.

PMID: 35949200 PMC: 9356037. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.06.008.


Effect of Dietary Organic and Inorganic Sulfur on the Performance of Coccidiosis Vaccine Challenged Broiler Chickens.

Jeon Y, Kim Y, Lee H, Park J, Heo Y, Chu G Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35565626 PMC: 9099933. DOI: 10.3390/ani12091200.


Incorporation of Dietary Methyl Sulfonyl Methane into the Egg Albumens of Laying Hens.

Kim Y, Lee S, Kim D, Lee H, Jeon Y, Lee S Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35326167 PMC: 8944815. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11030517.


Methylsulfonylmethane ameliorates inflammation via NF-κB and ERK/JNK-MAPK signaling pathway in chicken trachea and HD11 cells during Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection.

Miao Y, Niu D, Wang Z, Wang J, Wu Z, Bao J Poult Sci. 2022; 101(4):101706.

PMID: 35121233 PMC: 9024008. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101706.

References
1.
Gautier A, Latorre J, Matsler P, Rochell S . Longitudinal Characterization of Coccidiosis Control Methods on Live Performance and Nutrient Utilization in Broilers. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 6:468. PMC: 6971093. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00468. View

2.
Parmentier H, Abuzeid S, Reilingh G, Nieuwland M, Graat E . Immune responses and resistance to Eimeria acervulina of chickens divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells. Poult Sci. 2001; 80(7):894-900. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.7.894. View

3.
Kim W, Chaudhari A, Lillehoj H . Involvement of T Cell Immunity in Avian Coccidiosis. Front Immunol. 2019; 10:2732. PMC: 6886378. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02732. View

4.
Wallach M, Pillemer G, Yarus S, Halabi A, Pugatsch T, Mencher D . Passive immunization of chickens against Eimeria maxima infection with a monoclonal antibody developed against a gametocyte antigen. Infect Immun. 1990; 58(2):557-62. PMC: 258493. DOI: 10.1128/iai.58.2.557-562.1990. View

5.
Sorci G, Faivre B . Inflammation and oxidative stress in vertebrate host-parasite systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 364(1513):71-83. PMC: 2666694. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0151. View