» Articles » PMID: 33246451

Mental Health Professionals' Experiences with Shared Decision-making for Patients with Psychotic Disorders: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Nov 28
PMID 33246451
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process whereby clinicians and patients work together to select treatments based on both the patient's preferences and clinical evidence. Although patients with psychotic disorders want to participate more in decisions regarding their care, they have limited opportunities to do so because of various barriers. Knowing about health professionals' experiences with SDM is important toward achieving successful implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore health professionals' SDM experiences with patients with psychotic disorders.

Methods: Three focus group interviews were conducted, with a total of 18 health professionals who work at one of three Norwegian community mental health centres where patients with psychotic disorders are treated. We applied a descriptive and exploratory approach using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Health professionals primarily understand the SDM concept to mean giving patients information and presenting them with a choice between different antipsychotic medications. Among the barriers to SDM, they emphasized that patients with psychosis have a limited understanding of their health situation and that time is needed to build trust and alliances. Health professionals mainly understand patients with psychotic disorders as a group with limited abilities to make their own decisions. They also described the concept of SDM with little consideration of presenting different treatment options. Psychological or social interventions were often presented as complementary to antipsychotic medications, rather than as an alternative to them.

Conclusion: Health professionals' understanding of SDM is inconsistent with the definition commonly used in the literature. They consider patients with psychotic disorders to have limited abilities to participate in decisions regarding their own treatment. These findings suggest that health professionals need more theoretical and practical training in SDM.

Citing Articles

User and staff experiences of a revised process for coordinating support with shared decision making in the comorbidity field of practice: a qualitative interview study.

Jones A Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 20(1):2447095.

PMID: 39726153 PMC: 11703481. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2447095.


Exploring the unconventional: health professionals' experiences into medication-free treatment for patients with severe mental illness.

Reitan E, Riley H, Hoifodt T, Iversen V, Hoye A BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):805.

PMID: 39543560 PMC: 11566826. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06251-8.


Perspectives of adult patients with mental health disorders on the relationship with nurses: a focus group study.

Coelho J, Moreno Poyato A, Roldan Merino J, Sequeira C, Sampaio F BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):9.

PMID: 38163914 PMC: 10759621. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01663-5.


A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.

Howe J, MacPhee M, Duddy C, Habib H, Wong G, Jacklin S BMJ Qual Saf. 2023; 34(1):40-52.

PMID: 38071586 PMC: 11671929. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016615.


Shared decision making and associated factors among patients with psychotic disorders: a cross-sectional study.

Haugom E, Saltyte Benth J, Stensrud B, Ruud T, Clausen T, Landheim A BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):747.

PMID: 37833737 PMC: 10576360. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05257-y.


References
1.
Makoul G, Clayman M . An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 60(3):301-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010. View

2.
Drake R, Deegan P . Shared decision making is an ethical imperative. Psychiatr Serv. 2009; 60(8):1007. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1007. View

3.
De Las Cuevas C, Penate W . To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014; 26(6):372-81. DOI: 10.1017/neu.2014.21. View

4.
Cote-Arsenault D, Morrison-Beedy D . Practical advice for planning and conducting focus groups. Nurs Res. 1999; 48(5):280-3. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199909000-00009. View

5.
Deegan P . A web application to support recovery and shared decision making in psychiatric medication clinics. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010; 34(1):23-8. DOI: 10.2975/34.1.2010.23.28. View