» Articles » PMID: 33245997

Jump Power, Leg Press Power, Leg Strength and Grip Strength Differentially Associated with Physical Performance: The Developmental Epidemiologic Cohort Study (DECOS)

Overview
Journal Exp Gerontol
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Nov 27
PMID 33245997
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Weight-bearing jump tests that measure lower-extremity muscle power may be more strongly related to physical performance measures vs. non-weight-bearing leg press power, leg press strength and grip strength. We investigated if multiple muscle function measures differentially related to standard physical performance measures.

Materials/methods: In the Developmental Epidemiologic Cohort Study (DECOS; N = 68; age 78.5 ± 5.5 years; 57% women; 7% minorities), muscle function measures included power in Watts/kg (functional, weight-bearing: jump; mechanical: Nottingham power rig; Keiser pneumatic leg press) and strength in kg/kg body weight (Keiser pneumatic leg press; hand-held dynamometry). Physical performance outcomes included 6 m usual gait speed (m/s), usual-paced 400 m walk time (seconds), and 5-repeated chair stands speed (stands/s).

Results: Women (N = 31; 79.8 ± 5.0 years) had lower muscle function and slower gait speed compared to men (N = 25; 78.7 ± 6.6 years), though similar 400 m walk time and chair stands speed. In partial Pearson correlations adjusted for age, sex, race and height, muscle function measures were moderately to strongly correlated with each other (all p < 0.05), though the individual correlations varied. In multiple regression analyses, each muscle function measure was statistically associated with all physical performance outcomes in models adjusted for age, sex, race, height, self-reported diabetes, self-reported peripheral vascular disease and self-reported pain in legs/feet (all p < 0.05). Jump power (β = 0.75) and grip strength (β = 0.71) had higher magnitudes of association with faster gait speed than lower-extremity power and strength measures (β range: 0.32 to 0.58). Jump power (β = 0.56) had a slightly lower magnitude of association with faster 400 m walk time vs. Keiser power (β = 0.61), and a higher magnitude of association vs. Nottingham power, Keiser strength and grip strength (β range: 0.41 to 0.47). Jump power (β = 0.38) had a lower magnitude of association with chair stands speed than any other power or strength measures (β range: 0.50 to 0.65).

Conclusions: Jump power/kg and grip strength/kg may be more strongly related to faster gait speed, a standard measure of physical function and vital sign related to disability and mortality in older adults, compared to leg press power/strength. However, jump power/kg had a similar magnitude of association with 400 m walk time as Keiser power/kg and a lower magnitude of association with faster chair stands speed than the other muscle function measures. Importantly, choice of muscle function measures should carefully reflect the study focus and methodologic considerations, including population.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and Reliability of Grip Strength Measurements: A Comparative Device Analysis.

Granicher P, Maurer Y, Sporri J, Haller B, Swanenburg J, de Bie R J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39728258 PMC: 11678687. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040274.


Associations Between D3Cr Muscle Mass and Magnetic Resonance Thigh Muscle Volume With Strength, Power, Physical Performance, Fitness, and Limitations in Older Adults in the SOMMA Study.

Cawthon P, Blackwell T, Kritchevsky S, Newman A, Hepple R, Coen P J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024; 79(4).

PMID: 38367212 PMC: 11648972. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glae056.


The association between chrononutrition behaviors and muscle health among older adults: The study of muscle, mobility and aging.

Mao Z, Cawthon P, Kritchevsky S, Toledo F, Esser K, Erickson M Aging Cell. 2023; 23(6):e14059.

PMID: 38059319 PMC: 11166361. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14059.


Associations between DCr muscle mass and MR thigh muscle volume with strength, power, physical performance, fitness, and limitations in older adults in the SOMMA study.

Cawthon P, Blackwell T, Kritchevsky S, Newman A, Hepple R, Coen P medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37986809 PMC: 10659521. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298303.


Vigor to Frailty As a Continuum-A New Approach in the Study of Muscle, Mobility, and Aging Cohort.

Newman A, Blackwell T, Mau T, Cawthon P, Coen P, Cummings S J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023; 79(1).

PMID: 37847228 PMC: 10733210. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad244.


References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Caserotti P, Aagaard P, Larsen J, Puggaard L . Explosive heavy-resistance training in old and very old adults: changes in rapid muscle force, strength and power. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008; 18(6):773-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00732.x. View

3.
Lauretani F, Russo C, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A . Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003; 95(5):1851-60. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003. View

4.
Thompson B, Whitson M, Sobolewski E, Stock M . Effects of Age, Joint Angle, and Test Modality on Strength Production and Functional Outcomes. Int J Sports Med. 2017; 39(2):124-132. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121149. View

5.
Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M . Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011; 305(1):50-8. PMC: 3080184. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923. View