» Articles » PMID: 33243836

The Impact of False Positive COVID-19 Results in an Area of Low Prevalence

Overview
Journal Clin Med (Lond)
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Nov 27
PMID 33243836
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

False negative results in COVID-19 testing are well recognised and frequently discussed. False positive results, while less common and less frequently discussed, still have several adverse implications, including potential exposure of a non-infected person to the virus in a cohorted area. Although false positive results are proportionally greater in low prevalence settings, the consequences are significant at all times and potentially of greater significance in high-prevalence settings. We evaluated COVID-19 results in one area during a period of low prevalence. The consequences of these results are discussed and implications for these results in both high and low prevalence settings are considered. We also provide recommendations to minimise the risk and impact of false-positive results.

Citing Articles

Viral Involvement in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Zahid K, Hidayat W, Zakiawati D Cancer Manag Res. 2025; 17:309-330.

PMID: 39990277 PMC: 11846534. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S485418.


Reflections on COVID-19: A Literature Review of SARS-CoV-2 Testing.

Lau C, Oh H, Aw T Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852788 PMC: 11768752. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13010009.


A Truncated Multi-Thiol Aptamer-Based SARS-CoV-2 Electrochemical Biosensor: Towards Variant-Specific Point-of-Care Detection with Optimized Fabrication.

Molina Ramirez S, Samiseresht N, Martinez-Roque M, Catania F, Graef K, Rabe M Biosensors (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852074 PMC: 11763500. DOI: 10.3390/bios15010024.


Proposed computed tomography severity index for the evaluation of invasive fungal sinusitis: Preliminary results.

Manchanda S, Bhalla A, Nair A, Sikka K, Verma H, Thakar A World J Radiol. 2025; 16(12):771-781.

PMID: 39801668 PMC: 11718521. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.771.


Characterisation of specific responses to three models of viral antigens in immunocompetent older adults.

Rioseras B, Bueno-Garcia E, Garcia-Torre A, Lopez-Martinez R, Moro-Garcia M, Alonso-Alvarez S Immun Ageing. 2024; 21(1):86.

PMID: 39639316 PMC: 11619616. DOI: 10.1186/s12979-024-00488-3.


References
1.
Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Sekhar G, Thomas R . Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007; 56(1):45-50. PMC: 2636062. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.37595. View

2.
Watson J, Whiting P, Brush J . Interpreting a covid-19 test result. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1808. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1808. View

3.
Holborow A, Asad H, Porter L, Tidswell P, Johnston C, Blyth I . The clinical sensitivity of a single SARS-CoV-2 upper respiratory tract RT-PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 using convalescent antibody as a comparator. Clin Med (Lond). 2020; 20(6):e209-e211. PMC: 7687334. DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0555. View