» Articles » PMID: 33236275

Multilevel Factors Shaping Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among Criminal Justice-Involved Women

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 2020 Nov 25
PMID 33236275
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a key tool in HIV prevention efforts, little is known about PrEP as a prevention strategy for criminal justice-involved (CJI) women. The purpose of this study was to examine multilevel factors shaping PrEP awareness and acceptability among CJI women. Between January 2017 and December 2017, we conducted 52 interviews with CJI women at high risk for HIV and stakeholders from the criminal justice (CJ) and public health (PH) systems. Interviews explored awareness of PrEP and the multilevel factors shaping PrEP acceptability. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and executive summaries. Atlas.ti facilitated analyses. The majority of CJI women (n = 27) were, on average, 41.3 years, from racial and ethnic minority groups (56% Black/African-American; 19% Latinx) and reported engaging in recent high-risk behavior (nearly 60% engaged in transactional sex, 22% reported ≥ 4 sexual partners, and 37% reported injection drug use). Of system stakeholders (n = 25), 52% represented the CJ sector. Although CJI women were generally unaware of PrEP, attitudes toward PrEP were enthusiastic. Barriers to PrEP acceptability included medication side effects (individual level); distrust in HIV prevention mechanisms (community level); lack of local HIV prevention efforts among high-risk women (public policy/HIV epidemic stage level). Factors promoting PrEP included perceived HIV risk (individual level); PrEP being an HIV prevention method that women can control without partner negotiation (social and sexual network level); and availability of public health insurance (community level). Despite low awareness of PrEP, CJI women expressed positive attitudes toward PrEP. To improve PrEP access for CJI women, implementation efforts should address barriers and leverage facilitators across multiple levels to be maximally effective.

Citing Articles

Network determinants of relationship influence on HIV prevention decision-making among people in the social networks of women who have experienced incarceration in the US.

Knittel A, Varela G, Ferguson E, Hulshult H, Jackson J, Moody J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312584.

PMID: 39475913 PMC: 11524471. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312584.


eHealth-Enhanced Peer Navigation for Substance Use Treatment and HIV Prevention Service Linkage for Young Adults Surveilled by the Criminal Legal System: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Trial Study.

Creasy S, Sweet S, Myers J, Shumway M, Tolou-Shams M, McCaffrey N JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e54815.

PMID: 38530335 PMC: 11005443. DOI: 10.2196/54815.


Factors Associated with Planned Future Use of PrEP in the Next 3 Months and Likelihood to Use PrEP Among Black Cisgender HIV-negative Women in Texas.

Sophus A, Mitchell J, Barroso J, Sales J AIDS Behav. 2023; 28(1):72-92.

PMID: 37768428 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-04188-9.


HIV/Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening and Eligibility for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Women Incarcerated in an Urban County Jail.

Desai J, Krakower D, Harris B, Culp S, Nijhawan A Sex Transm Dis. 2023; 50(10):675-679.

PMID: 37699368 PMC: 10503027. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001852.


Systematic review of the values and preferences regarding the use of injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition.

Lorenzetti L, Dinh N, van der Straten A, Fonner V, Ridgeway K, Rodolph M J Int AIDS Soc. 2023; 26 Suppl 2:e26107.

PMID: 37439057 PMC: 10805120. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26107.


References
1.
Aaron E, Blum C, Seidman D, Hoyt M, Simone J, Sullivan M . Optimizing Delivery of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis for Women in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018; 32(1):16-23. PMC: 5756936. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2017.0201. View

2.
Auerbach J, Kinsky S, Brown G, Charles V . Knowledge, attitudes, and likelihood of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among US women at risk of acquiring HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014; 29(2):102-10. PMC: 4321978. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2014.0142. View

3.
Baral S, Logie C, Grosso A, Wirtz A, Beyrer C . Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:482. PMC: 3674938. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-482. View

4.
Becasen J, Denard C, Mullins M, Higa D, Sipe T . Estimating the Prevalence of HIV and Sexual Behaviors Among the US Transgender Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2006-2017. Am J Public Health. 2018; 109(1):e1-e8. PMC: 6301428. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304727. View

5.
Beckwith C, Zaller N, Fu J, Montague B, Rich J . Opportunities to diagnose, treat, and prevent HIV in the criminal justice system. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010; 55 Suppl 1:S49-55. PMC: 3017345. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181f9c0f7. View