» Articles » PMID: 33229569

Chromatin Topology and the Timing of Enhancer Function at the Locus

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Nov 24
PMID 33229569
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The gene cluster is critical for proper limb formation in tetrapods. In the emerging limb buds, different subgroups of genes respond first to a proximal regulatory signal, then to a distal signal that organizes digits. These two regulations are exclusive from one another and emanate from two distinct topologically associating domains (TADs) flanking , both containing a range of appropriate enhancer sequences. The telomeric TAD (T-DOM) contains several enhancers active in presumptive forearm cells and is divided into two sub-TADs separated by a CTCF-rich boundary, which defines two regulatory submodules. To understand the importance of this particular regulatory topology to control gene transcription in time and space, we either deleted or inverted this sub-TAD boundary, eliminated the CTCF binding sites, or inverted the entire T-DOM to exchange the respective positions of the two sub-TADs. The effects of such perturbations on the transcriptional regulation of genes illustrate the requirement of this regulatory topology for the precise timing of gene activation. However, the spatial distribution of transcripts was eventually resumed, showing that the presence of enhancer sequences, rather than either their exact topology or a particular chromatin architecture, is the key factor. We also show that the affinity of enhancers to find their natural target genes can overcome the presence of both a strong TAD border and an unfavorable orientation of CTCF sites.

Citing Articles

Biology of Hox Genes: Questions and Technological Challenges.

Parambil S, De Kumar B Methods Mol Biol. 2025; 2889:1-10.

PMID: 39745601 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4322-8_1.


TAD-dependent sub-TAD is required for enhancer-promoter interaction enabling the β-globin transcription.

Lee D, Kang J, Kim A FASEB J. 2024; 38(22):e70181.

PMID: 39545685 PMC: 11698014. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202401526RR.


Structural perturbation of chromatin domains with multiple developmental regulators can severely impact gene regulation and development.

Chakraborty S, Wenzlitschke N, Anderson M, Eraso A, Baudic M, Thompson J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39372737 PMC: 11451586. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.03.606480.


TAD border deletion at the Kit locus causes tissue-specific ectopic activation of a neighboring gene.

Kabirova E, Ryzhkova A, Lukyanchikova V, Khabarova A, Korablev A, Shnaider T Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4521.

PMID: 38806452 PMC: 11133455. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48523-7.


Imputation of 3D genome structure by genetic-epigenetic interaction modeling in mice.

Kuffler L, Skelly D, Czechanski A, Fortin H, Munger S, Baker C Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38669177 PMC: 11052574. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88222.


References
1.
Woltering J, Vonk F, Muller H, Bardine N, Tuduce I, de Bakker M . Axial patterning in snakes and caecilians: evidence for an alternative interpretation of the Hox code. Dev Biol. 2009; 332(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.031. View

2.
Geeven G, Teunissen H, de Laat W, de Wit E . peakC: a flexible, non-parametric peak calling package for 4C and Capture-C data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(15):e91. PMC: 6125690. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky443. View

3.
Soshnikova N, Montavon T, Leleu M, Galjart N, Duboule D . Functional analysis of CTCF during mammalian limb development. Dev Cell. 2010; 19(6):819-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.009. View

4.
Montavon T, Soshnikova N, Mascrez B, Joye E, Thevenet L, Splinter E . A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell. 2011; 147(5):1132-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.023. View

5.
Hnisz D, Weintraub A, Day D, Valton A, Bak R, Li C . Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science. 2016; 351(6280):1454-1458. PMC: 4884612. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad9024. View