» Articles » PMID: 33224841

Standardisation of Thyroid Cytology Terminology and Practice: Are Modifications Necessary?-a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Gland Surg
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Nov 23
PMID 33224841
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Universally accepted guidelines for diagnosis and management of any disease are desirable. Standardization of thyroid cytology reporting is aimed at guiding and improving clinical decision-making and management. However, socio-economic, and local factors and differences in disease prevalence and patterns require modification to suit local settings. 'One size fit all' approach is not possible for any disease diagnosis or management. The same concept is applicable in diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. An additional special issue is the well-known high inter and intra-observer variability in the histological and cytological diagnosis of thyroid neoplasms. Despite this, thyroid cytology has a very significant influence in the management of thyroid diseases. An approach based on common principals with appropriate modifications that suits countries or continents is desirable and sustainable. The principals of TBSRTC have served as a framework for similar tiered classifications for reporting thyroid cytopathology. This article discusses globally available professional guidelines based on a common framework with appropriate modifications, with the universal aim of risk stratification of thyroid nodules.

Citing Articles

Unveiling Variations: A Comprehensive Comparison of Five Globally Used Thyroid Cytology Reporting Systems With Histopathological Correlation.

Ramamoorthy S, Boddapati A, Venkata Renuka I, Imandi S, Mounica B Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53359.

PMID: 38314381 PMC: 10831778. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53359.


The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.

Kakudo K, Jung C, Liu Z, Hirokawa M, Bychkov A, Vuong H J Pathol Transl Med. 2023; 57(6):289-304.

PMID: 37981725 PMC: 10660359. DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2023.10.04.

References
1.
Liu Z, Bychkov A, Jung C, Hirokawa M, Sui S, Hong S . Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the morphological evaluation of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice. Pathol Int. 2019; 69(4):202-210. DOI: 10.1111/pin.12779. View

2.
Burlingame O, Kesse K, Silverman S, Cibas E . On-site adequacy evaluations performed by cytotechnologists: correlation with final interpretations of 5241 image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011; 120(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20184. View

3.
ORELL S, Philips J . Broadsheet number 57: problems in fine needle biopsy of the thyroid. Pathology. 2000; 32(3):191-8. View

4.
Nga M, Kumarasinghe M, Tie B, Sterrett G, Wood B, Walsh J . Experience with standardized thyroid fine-needle aspiration reporting categories: follow-up data from 529 cases with "indeterminate" or "atypical" reports. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010; 118(6):423-33. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20111. View

5.
Sarkis L, Norlen O, Aniss A, Watson N, Delbridge L, Sidhu S . The Australian experience with the Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies. Pathology. 2014; 46(7):592-5. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000168. View