» Articles » PMID: 33221385

Patient Perspectives on Active Vs. Passive Music Therapy for Cancer in the Inpatient Setting: A Qualitative Analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Nov 22
PMID 33221385
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Music therapy (MT) is a nonpharmacologic therapy where licensed therapists provide active (e.g., singing, playing songs) or passive (e.g., listening) music-based interventions. Both active and passive MT are effective techniques for treating cancer-related symptoms. However, the influence of active vs. passive MT techniques on patient-reported perceptions and experiences of care have yet to be explored.

Objectives: To understand how active and passive MT is perceived and experienced by patients with cancer.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of semistructured interviews collected as part of a quality improvement study (n = 20) with patients in the inpatient setting who had received active or passive MT within the past 24 hours. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Four themes emerged: 1) Different articulations of benefit for recipients of active vs. passive MT; 2) patient choice as a form of empowerment; 3) changed perception of hospital experience; and 4) differing recommendations for future MT. Recipients of active MT emphasized the session's interactive elements, finding the sessions stimulating by providing opportunities for joyous social interaction not centered on their diagnosis. Passive MT recipients focused on the calming therapeutic effect of the session, easing anxieties through focus and reflection on the music itself.

Conclusion: This analysis builds on current MT literature by providing insights specifically from oncology patients treated in the inpatient setting. Patients experience active and passive MT in different ways and perceived unique benefits for coping with cancer from each technique. Our findings can inform development of specific MT for symptom control in hospital settings.

Citing Articles

Oxytocin as a physiological correlate of dyadic music therapy relationships - a randomized crossover pilot study.

Busse P, Neugebauer L, Kaschubowski G, Anheyer D, Ostermann T Front Behav Neurosci. 2025; 18:1504229.

PMID: 39949817 PMC: 11821654. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1504229.


[Research advances on the application of music therapy in pain management of children with burns].

Duan D, Zhang Z, Mao Y, Zhang H Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023; 39(3):280-284.

PMID: 37805726 PMC: 11630358. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220328-00098.


Receptive music therapy versus group music therapy with breast cancer patients hospitalized for surgery.

Lagattolla F, Zanchi B, Pietro M, Cormio C, Lorusso V, Diotaiuti S Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(3):162.

PMID: 36781543 PMC: 9924845. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07624-7.


Impact of Physical Contact on Preterm Infants' Vital Sign Response to Live Music Therapy.

Kobus S, Diezel M, Dewan M, Huening B, Dathe A, Felderhoff-Mueser U Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15).

PMID: 35954880 PMC: 9368366. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159524.


Potential Benefits of Music Therapy on Stroke Rehabilitation.

Xu C, He Z, Shen Z, Huang F Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022; 2022:9386095.

PMID: 35757506 PMC: 9217607. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9386095.


References
1.
Bauml J, Chokshi S, Schapira M, Im E, Li S, Langer C . Do attitudes and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine impact its use among patients with cancer? A cross-sectional survey. Cancer. 2015; 121(14):2431-8. PMC: 5589132. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29173. View

2.
Bradt J, Dileo C, Magill L, Teague A . Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (8):CD006911. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub3. View

3.
Mao J, Palmer S, Straton J, Cronholm P, Keddem S, Knott K . Cancer survivors with unmet needs were more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine. J Cancer Surviv. 2008; 2(2):116-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-008-0052-3. View

4.
Henry D, Viswanathan H, Elkin E, Traina S, Wade S, Cella D . Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer. 2008; 16(7):791-801. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0380-2. View

5.
Lathan C, Cronin A, Tucker-Seeley R, Zafar S, Ayanian J, Schrag D . Association of Financial Strain With Symptom Burden and Quality of Life for Patients With Lung or Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(15):1732-40. PMC: 4966336. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2232. View