» Articles » PMID: 33219727

Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Overview
Journal J Prosthodont
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Nov 21
PMID 33219727
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with different designs of inlays, onlays and endocrowns.

Materials And Methods: Extracted mandibular third molars (n = 180) were used. An access cavity was prepared on the occlusal surface of each tooth and the roots were obturated with gutta percha. All specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 30/group) according to the cavity design and the restoration material used. C: control group without access cavity preparation. IE: MOD inlay preparation with EverX Posterior (GC Europe) in the pulp chamber. IG: MOD inlay preparation with G-aenial Universal Flo (GC America) in the pulp chamber. OE: onlay preparation with EverX Posterior (GC Europe) in the pulp chamber. OG: onlay preparation with G-aenial Universal Flo (GC America) in the pulp chamber. EC: endocrown with an empty pulp chamber. All restorations were fabricated with CAD/CAM system using CERASMART (GC Dental products Europe, Belgium) CAD/CAM blocks. Specimens were thermal-cycled and were subjected to a compressive load applied at 30° angle relative to the long axis of the tooth with a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests. Chi-square test and Fisher Exact tests were used for the comparisons among groups.

Results: The mean fracture strength was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001); it was significantly highest for intact teeth, followed by endocrowns (p = 0.021). The strength was significantly lower for inlays (with G-aenial Universal Flo and EverX Posterior), intermediate for onlays with EverX Posterior followed by onlays with G-aenial Universal Flo.

Conclusions: Endocrowns exhibited higher fracture resistance than other tested composite resin groups. Endocrowns and onlays showed a more favorable failure mode than inlay restorations.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Behaviors of Molars Restored with Endocrowns Composed of Different Materials.

Li Z, Zhu J, Xu Y, Bao X, Wang X Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(2).

PMID: 39859719 PMC: 11766967. DOI: 10.3390/ma18020250.


Endocrown: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to Conventional Fixed Prosthesis.

Kirthiga M, Thomas G, Jose S, Shyam A, M A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74514.

PMID: 39726497 PMC: 11671110. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74514.


Fracture strength and marginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic endocrowns and non-retentive overlays for endodontically treated molar teeth.

Hezavehi M, Asli H, Hemmati Y, Falahchai M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1524.

PMID: 39707291 PMC: 11662440. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05327-x.


Two-year clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth with different cavity preparation designs: a randomized clinical trial.

Fouda H, Hassanein O, Saber S, Haridy M, Baz M, Ahmed H BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1009.

PMID: 39210360 PMC: 11363545. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04725-5.


Application of Bulk-Fill Composite to Simplify the Cementation of Indirect Restorations: The COMBO Technique.

Chiodera G, Monterubbianesi R, Tosco V, Papini O, Orsini G, Putignano A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195083 PMC: 11352567. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080239.