Implicit Associations of Teleology and Essentialism Concepts with Genetics Concepts Among Secondary School Students

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2020 Nov 20

PMID 33216764

Authors

Florian Stern

Marine Delaval

Kostas Kampourakis

Andreas Muller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this article, we present the development and validation of an implicit association test for measuring secondary school students' associations between genetics concepts and teleology concepts on the one hand, and between genetics concepts and essentialism concepts on the other hand. In total, 169 students from 16 school classes took part in the study, from January 2018 to May 2018. We investigated the strength of the aforementioned associations and the influence of various covariates such as gender, age, school class, or previous learning of biology on the association of teleology or essentialism concepts with genetics concepts through an analysis of covariance and a multi-level analysis. We found moderate associations between genetics and teleology concepts, as well as between genetics and essentialism concepts. These results might reflect a tendency of students of different ages and with various backgrounds to think about genes in terms of goals (teleology) and stability (essentialism), which should be investigated further in future research.

References

Gould W, Heine S . Implicit essentialism: genetic concepts are implicitly associated with fate concepts. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38176. PMC: 3369887. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038176. View

Kampourakis K . Students' "teleological misconceptions" in evolution education: why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution (N Y). 2020; 13(1):1. PMC: 7328066. DOI: 10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z. View

Betz N, Leffers J, Thor E, Fux M, Nesnera K, Tanner K . Cognitive Construal-Consistent Instructor Language in the Undergraduate Biology Classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019; 18(4):ar63. PMC: 6889842. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-04-0076. View

Goldberg R, Thompson-Schill S . Developmental "roots" in mature biological knowledge. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(4):480-7. PMC: 3025485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02320.x. View

. Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories About the World Are So Often Wrong. Science. 2017; 356(6336):385. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan4200. View

Gelman S, Markman E . Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child Dev. 1987; 58(6):1532-41. View

Coley J, Tanner K . Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 14(1):ar8. PMC: 4353083. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094. View

Mills Shaw K, Van Horne K, Zhang H, Boughman J . Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics. 2008; 178(3):1157-68. PMC: 2278104. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.084194. View

Morton T, Postmes T, Haslam S, Hornsey M . Theorizing gender in the face of social change: is there anything essential about essentialism?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 96(3):653-64. DOI: 10.1037/a0012966. View

10.

Keil F . Psychology. Science starts early. Science. 2011; 331(6020):1022-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1195221. View

11.

Rosengren K, Gelman S, Kalish C, McCormick M . As time goes by: children's early understanding of growth in animals. Child Dev. 1991; 62(6):1302-20. View

12.

Diesendruck G, Goldfein-Elbaz R, Rhodes M, Gelman S, Neumark N . Cross-cultural differences in children's beliefs about the objectivity of social categories. Child Dev. 2013; 84(6):1906-17. PMC: 3714352. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12108. View

13.

Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

14.

Haslam N, ROTHSCHILD L, Ernst D . Essentialist beliefs about social categories. Br J Soc Psychol. 2000; 39 ( Pt 1):113-27. DOI: 10.1348/014466600164363. View

15.

Lombrozo T, Carey S . Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition. 2005; 99(2):167-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009. View

16.

Morton T, Hornsey M, Postmes T . Shifting ground: the variable use of essentialism in contexts of inclusion and exclusion. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008; 48(Pt 1):35-59. DOI: 10.1348/014466607X270287. View

17.

Shtulman A, Harrington K . Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan. Top Cogn Sci. 2015; 8(1):118-37. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12174. View

18.

Baron A, Banaji M . The development of implicit attitudes. Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychol Sci. 2005; 17(1):53-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x. View

19.

Gawronski B . Six Lessons for a Cogent Science of Implicit Bias and Its Criticism. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019; 14(4):574-595. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619826015. View

20.

Dar-Nimrod I, Heine S . Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychol Bull. 2010; 137(5):800-18. PMC: 3394457. DOI: 10.1037/a0021860. View