» Articles » PMID: 33215332

Treatment Costs of Basal Insulin Regimens for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 20
PMID 33215332
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our objectives were to describe the basal insulin treatment regimens most widely used in a real-world setting in France and to estimate the associated treatment costs in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted (November 2017-February 2018) among adult patients with T2DM requiring basal insulin therapy for their own use in a representative sample of pharmacies. Costs were compared between patients treated with three recently marketed insulins (glargine 300 U/ml [Gla-300], biosimilar glargine 100 U/ml [Gla-100] and a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide) and those treated with three established basal or intermediate insulins: branded glargine 100 U/ml, insulin detemir and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin [NPH]).

Results: Overall, 1933 patients were analysed. Gla-300 accounted for 59.9% of novel basal insulin prescriptions, and branded Gla-100 accounted for 67.9% of established insulin prescriptions. Recent insulins were more frequently associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues. Results confirmed a lower rate of severe hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 than with Gla-100. On average, weekly total costs of treatment with all basal insulins were not significantly different, except with detemir, where they were higher.

Conclusion: New basal insulins are expected to be integrated into clinical practice. This analysis shows that their use does not impact upon the management cost of insulin therapy in people with T2DM.

Citing Articles

Basal Insulinotherapy in Patients Living with Diabetes in France: The EF-BI Study.

Gourdy P, Darmon P, Borget I, Emery C, Bureau I, Detournay B Diabetes Ther. 2024; 15(6):1349-1360.

PMID: 38642261 PMC: 11096141. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01577-8.

References
1.
Zhou F, Nicholls C, Xie L, Wang Y, Vaidya N, Meneghini L . Hypoglycaemia and treatment patterns among insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes who switched to insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus other basal insulin in a real-world setting. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019; 2(3):e00073. PMC: 6613231. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.73. View

2.
Pettus J, Roussel R, Zhou F, Bosnyak Z, Westerbacka J, Berria R . Rates of Hypoglycemia Predicted in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml Versus First- and Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs: The Real-World LIGHTNING Study. Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(2):617-633. PMC: 6437256. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-0568-8. View

3.
Charbonnel B, Simon D, Dallongeville J, Bureau I, Dejager S, Levy-Bachelot L . Direct Medical Costs of Type 2 Diabetes in France: An Insurance Claims Database Analysis. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018; 2(2):209-219. PMC: 5972121. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-017-0050-3. View

4.
Ritzel R, Roussel R, Bolli G, Vinet L, Brulle-Wohlhueter C, Glezer S . Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015; 17(9):859-67. PMC: 4676914. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12485. View

5.
Charbonnel B, Penfornis A, Varroud-Vial M, Kusnik-Joinville O, Detournay B . Insulin therapy for diabetes mellitus: treatment regimens and associated costs. Diabetes Metab. 2011; 38(2):156-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.10.003. View