» Articles » PMID: 33214342

The Impact of Omeprazole on Mycophenolate Pharmacokinetics in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Overview
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2020 Nov 20
PMID 33214342
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The absorption rates of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) may be influenced by the concomitant use of omeprazole.

Methods: One hundred kidney transplant patients were recruited during their outpatient visits, including 50 on MMF and 50 on EC-MPS. At the clinic, a predose mycophenolic acid (MPA) sample (C0) was collected; subsequently, the participants received the proton-pump inhibitor omeprazole along with either MMF or EC-MPS. Two more blood samples were collected at 1.5 and 3.5 hours and used to estimate an area under the curve (AUC) from zero to 12 hours [AUC (0-12)].

Results: The mean number of months after transplant was 92 months. The median AUC (0-12) and C0 results were 62.2 mg·h/L and 2.0 mg/L for the MMF group and 71.9 mg·h/L and 1.8 mg/L for the EC-MPS group (P = 0.160 and 0.225, respectively). Interestingly, 54% of the MMF group and 62% of the EC-MPS group showed AUCs above the target values. The correlation between MPA C0 and the predicted AUC was poor in both groups.

Conclusion: Omeprazole can be safely co-administered with either MMF or EC-MPS, as it did not compromise the MPA exposure. Unexpectedly, however, a high percentage of patients presented MPA AUCs exceeding the target value, highlighting the importance of periodically assessing MPA level.

Citing Articles

Omics-based biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of kidney allograft rejection.

Lim J, Chung B, Lee S, Jung H, Choi J, Cho J Korean J Intern Med. 2022; 37(3):520-533.

PMID: 35417937 PMC: 9082440. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2021.518.


A Systematic Review of Multiple Linear Regression-Based Limited Sampling Strategies for Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation.

Sobiak J, Resztak M Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021; 46(6):721-742.

PMID: 34480746 PMC: 8599354. DOI: 10.1007/s13318-021-00713-0.

References
1.
Jia Y, Peng B, Li L, Wang J, Wang X, Qi G . Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve With Limited-Sampling Strategy in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium. Ther Drug Monit. 2016; 39(1):29-36. PMC: 5228625. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000360. View

2.
Cholewinski G, Malachowska-Ugarte M, Dzierzbicka K . The chemistry of mycophenolic acid--synthesis and modifications towards desired biological activity. Curr Med Chem. 2010; 17(18):1926-41. DOI: 10.2174/092986710791163920. View

3.
Borrows R, Chusney G, Loucaidou M, James A, Lee J, Tromp J . Mycophenolic acid 12-h trough level monitoring in renal transplantation: association with acute rejection and toxicity. Am J Transplant. 2006; 6(1):121-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01151.x. View

4.
Rupprecht K, Schmidt C, Raspe A, Schweda F, Shipkova M, Fischer W . Bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is differentially affected by pantoprazole in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 49(10):1196-201. DOI: 10.1177/0091270009344988. View

5.
Imai E, Horio M, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Hara S . Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the MDRD study equation modified for Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2007; 11(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-006-0453-4. View