» Articles » PMID: 33207162

User Characteristics of a Low-Acuity Emergency Department Alternative for Low-Income Patients

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33207162
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) use for healthcare that can be treated elsewhere is costly to the healthcare system. However, convenience settings such as urgent care centers (UCC) are generally inaccessible to low-income patients. Housing an UCC within a federally qualified health center (FQHC UCC) provides an accessible convenience setting for low-income patients. In 2014 a FQHC UCC opened two blocks from an ED in the same health system. Our goal was to compare characteristics, access to care, and utilization preferences for FQHC UCC and low-acuity ED patients through retrospective chart review and prospective surveying.

Methods: We completed a retrospective chart review of all patients from March 1, 2018-March 1, 2019, and compared characteristics of low-acuity ED patients (N = 3,911) and FQHC UCC patients (N = 12,571). We also surveyed FQHC UCC patients (N = 201) and low-acuity ED patients (N = 198) from January-July 2019.

Results: Half of FQHC UCC patients had private insurance. Of ED patients, 29% were aware of the FQHC UCC. Both groups had similar rates of primary care providers. The most common reason for choosing the ED was perceived severity, and for choosing a FQHC UCC was speed.

Conclusion: These findings show similarities and differences between these two patient populations. Future research is needed to determine utilization patterns and in-depth reasons behind them. Interventions that help patients decide where to go for low-acuity care may create more utilization efficiency.

Citing Articles

Strength in the gap: A rapid review of principles and practices for urgent care centres.

Benjamin P, Bryce R, Oyedokun T, Stempien J Healthc Manage Forum. 2022; 36(2):101-106.

PMID: 36519425 PMC: 9976643. DOI: 10.1177/08404704221143300.


Portrait of the Emergency Department at Orotta National Referral and Teaching Hospital in Asmara, Eritrea: A Prospective Observational Study.

Mengistu S, Achila O, Negash S, Tesfaldet Y, Tewolde N, Yohannes N Open Access Emerg Med. 2022; 14:195-215.

PMID: 35509433 PMC: 9059985. DOI: 10.2147/OAEM.S352638.

References
1.
Kangovi S, Barg F, Carter T, Long J, Shannon R, Grande D . Understanding why patients of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(7):1196-203. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0825. View

2.
Gaieski D, Agarwal A, Mikkelsen M, Drumheller B, Sante S, Shofer F . The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(7):953-960. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.061. View

3.
Billings J, Parikh N, Mijanovich T . Emergency department use: the New York Story. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2001; (434):1-12. View

4.
Weinick R, Bristol S, DesRoches C . Urgent care centers in the U.S.: findings from a national survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9:79. PMC: 2685126. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-79. View

5.
Kulstad E, Sikka R, Sweis R, Kelley K, Rzechula K . ED overcrowding is associated with an increased frequency of medication errors. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28(3):304-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.12.014. View