» Articles » PMID: 33206241

Implementation of Technology-Delivered Diabetes Self-care Interventions in Clinical Care: a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Curr Diab Rep
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33206241
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Evidence is growing for the positive effects of technology-delivered diabetes self-care interventions on behavioral and clinical outcomes. However, our understanding of how to effectively implement these interventions into routine clinical practice is limited. This article provides an overview of the methods and results of studies examining the implementation of technology-delivered diabetes self-care interventions into clinical care. We focus specifically on patient-facing behavioral interventions delivered with technology (e.g., text messaging, apps, websites).

Recent Findings: Eleven articles were included in the review. Most studies (n = 9) examined barriers and facilitators to implementation, while about half (n = 5) integrated the intervention into clinical care and evaluated implementation and/or effectiveness. Only six studies applied a theory or framework. The most common determinants of implementation were time constraints for clinic staff, familiarity with technology, knowledge of the intervention, and perceived value. We found substantial variation in implementation outcomes, including which were reported, how they were assessed, and the results. In the four studies that evaluated effectiveness, hemoglobin A1c improved. Successful implementation of technology-delivered interventions has the potential to transform healthcare delivery and improve diabetes health on a population level. Promising strategies to address common determinants of implementation include appointing a clinic champion, developing staff training and educational materials, and adapting intervention processes to the clinic context. Future research should evaluate these implementation strategies to understand when and how they impact outcomes. Frameworks such as Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) can help ensure outcomes are systematically reported and allow for comparison across studies.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the National Rollout of a Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Intervention: Qualitative Interview Study With Local National Health Service Leads Responsible for Implementation.

Brunton L, Cotterill S, Wilson P J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55546.

PMID: 39321457 PMC: 11464934. DOI: 10.2196/55546.


Underestimated Factors Regarding the Use of Technology in Daily Practice of Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study Among Health Care Professionals.

Groeneveld S, den Ouden M, van Gemert-Pijnen J, Verdaasdonk R, van Os-Medendorp H JMIR Nurs. 2023; 6:e41032.

PMID: 37494092 PMC: 10413233. DOI: 10.2196/41032.


Proposing a Practical, Simplified Framework for Implementing Integrated Diabetes Data and Technology Solutions.

Espinoza J, Chin S, Shah P, Tut M, Raymond J Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023; 3:867284.

PMID: 36992736 PMC: 10012144. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.867284.


Exploring determinants and strategies for implementing self-management support text messaging interventions in safety net clinics.

Nelson L, Roddy M, Bergner E, Gonzalez J, Gentry C, LeStourgeon L J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 6(1):e126.

PMID: 36590364 PMC: 9794969. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.503.


Evaluation of the My Diabetes Care Patient Portal Intervention: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Martinez W, Hackstadt A, Hickson G, Rosenbloom S, Elasy T JMIR Res Protoc. 2021; 10(5):e25955.

PMID: 34032578 PMC: 8188319. DOI: 10.2196/25955.

References
1.
Patrick K, Hekler E, Estrin D, Mohr D, Riper H, Crane D . The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(5):816-824. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001. View

2.
Greenwood D, Gee P, Fatkin K, Peeples M . A Systematic Review of Reviews Evaluating Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(5):1015-1027. PMC: 5951000. DOI: 10.1177/1932296817713506. View

3.
May C, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S . Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:29. PMC: 2693517. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29. View

4.
Ross J, Stevenson F, Dack C, Pal K, May C, Michie S . Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):794. PMC: 6194634. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7. View

5.
Watterson J, Rodriguez H, Shortell S, Aguilera A . Improved Diabetes Care Management Through a Text-Message Intervention for Low-Income Patients: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2018; 3(4):e15. PMC: 6238849. DOI: 10.2196/diabetes.8645. View