» Articles » PMID: 33206146

Cost Minimization Analysis of a Teledermatology Triage System in a Managed Care Setting

Overview
Journal JAMA Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33206146
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Teledermatology (TD) enables remote triage and management of dermatology patients. Previous analyses of TD systems have demonstrated improved access to care but an inconsistent fiscal impact.

Objective: To compare the organizationwide cost of managing newly referred dermatology patients within a TD triage system vs a conventional dermatology care model at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (hereafter referred to as the ZSFG) in California.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective cost minimization analysis was conducted of 2098 patients referred to the dermatology department at the ZSFG between June 1 and December 31, 2017.

Intervention: Implementation of the TD triage system in January 2015.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The main outcome was mean cost to the health care organization to manage newly referred dermatology patients with or without TD triage. To estimate costs, decision-tree models were constructed to characterize possible care paths with TD triage and within a conventional dermatology care model. Costs associated with primary care visits, dermatology visits, and TD visits were then applied to the decision-tree models to estimate the mean cost of managing patients following each care path for 6 months. The mean cost for each visit type incorporated personnel costs, with the mean cost per TD consultation also incorporating software implementation and maintenance costs. Finally, ZSFG patient data were applied within the models to evaluate branch probabilities, enabling calculation of mean cost per patient within each model.

Results: The analysis captured 2098 patients (1154 men [55.0%]; mean [SD] age, 53.4 [16.8] years), with 1099 (52.4%) having Medi-Cal insurance and 879 (41.9%) identifying as non-White. In the decision-tree model with TD triage, the mean (SD) cost per patient to the health care organization was $559.84 ($319.29). In the decision-tree model for conventional dermatology care, the mean (SD) cost per patient was $699.96 ($390.24). Therefore, the TD model demonstrated a statistically significant mean (SE) cost savings of $140.12 ($11.01) per patient. Given an annual dermatology referral volume of 3150 patients, the analysis estimates an annual savings of $441 378.

Conclusions And Relevance: Implementation of a TD triage system within the dermatology department at the ZSFG was associated with cost savings, suggesting that managed health care settings may experience significant cost savings from using TD to triage and manage patients.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap through telemedicine: Pilot study on the acceptance and use of teledermatology for urticaria.

Hindelang M, Sitaru S, Fischer C, Biedermann T, Zink A J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024; 23(1):40-52.

PMID: 39428756 PMC: 11711928. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15557.


Hybrid care potential of teledermatology: The importance of linking digital and physical practice and acceptance of online services: A cross-sectional study.

Hindelang M, Tizek L, Harders C, Sommer-Eska L Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(7):e2241.

PMID: 38983681 PMC: 11231929. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2241.


The Past, the Present and the Future of Teledermatology: A Narrative Review.

Tommasino N, Megna M, Cacciapuoti S, Villani A, Martora F, Ruggiero A Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024; 17:717-723.

PMID: 38529172 PMC: 10962464. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S462799.


Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Application for Classification of Melanomas, Melanocytic Nevi, and Seborrheic Keratoses.

Liutkus J, Kriukas A, Stragyte D, Mazeika E, Raudonis V, Galetzka W Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443533 PMC: 10340832. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132139.


Implementation and evaluation of a store-and-forward teledermatology workflow in a United States safety-net hospital urgent care emergency center: A retrospective cohort study.

Carr C, Alame A, Chong B, Mauskar M, Metzger J, Neal C JAAD Int. 2023; 12:112-120.

PMID: 37409319 PMC: 10319336. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.04.013.


References
1.
Livingstone J, Solomon J . An assessment of the cost-effectiveness, safety of referral and patient satisfaction of a general practice teledermatology service. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2015; 7(2):31-5. PMC: 4494473. DOI: 10.1080/17571472.2015.11493433. View

2.
De la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado J, de Castro C . Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 21(2):81-5. PMC: 4312789. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053. View

3.
Mohan G, Molina G, Stavert R . Store and forward teledermatology improves dermatology knowledge among referring primary care providers: A survey-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 79(5):960-961. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.05.006. View

4.
Whited J, Datta S, Hall R, Foy M, Marbrey L, Grambow S . An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2004; 9(4):351-60. DOI: 10.1089/153056203772744671. View

5.
Chansky P, Simpson C, Lipoff J . Implementation of a dermatology teletriage system to improve access in an underserved clinic: A retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 77(5):975-977. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.06.025. View