» Articles » PMID: 33205945

The RNA Polymerase α Subunit Recognizes the DNA Shape of the Upstream Promoter Element

Overview
Journal Biochemistry
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33205945
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We demonstrate here that the α subunit C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase (αCTD) recognizes the upstream promoter (UP) DNA element via its characteristic minor groove shape and electrostatic potential. In two compositionally distinct crystallized assemblies, a pair of αCTD subunits bind in tandem to the UP element consensus A-tract that is 6 bp in length (A-tract), each with their arginine 265 guanidinium group inserted into the minor groove. The A-tract minor groove is significantly narrowed in these crystal structures, as well as in computationally predicted structures of free and bound DNA duplexes derived by Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations, respectively. The negative electrostatic potential of free A-tract DNA is substantially enhanced compared to that of generic DNA. Shortening the A-tract by 1 bp is shown to "knock out" binding of the second αCTD through widening of the minor groove. Furthermore, in computationally derived structures with arginine 265 mutated to alanine in either αCTD, either with or without the "knockout" DNA mutation, contact with the DNA is perturbed, highlighting the importance of arginine 265 in achieving αCTD-DNA binding. These results demonstrate that the importance of the DNA shape in sequence-dependent recognition of DNA by RNA polymerase is comparable to that of certain transcription factors.

Citing Articles

Probing Electrostatic Interactions in DNA-Bound CRISPR/Cas9 Complexes by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Fatemi Abhari S, Di Felice R ACS Omega. 2024; 9(45):44974-44988.

PMID: 39554421 PMC: 11561601. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04359.


The hallmarks of a tradeoff in transcriptomes that balances stress and growth functions.

Dalldorf C, Rychel K, Szubin R, Hefner Y, Patel A, Zielinski D Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 37090546 PMC: 10120744. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2729651/v1.


Structural basis of three different transcription activation strategies adopted by a single regulator SoxS.

Shi J, Wang L, Wen A, Wang F, Zhang Y, Yu L Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(19):11359-11373.

PMID: 36243985 PMC: 9638938. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac898.


It is in the flanks: Conformational flexibility of transcription factor binding sites.

Chiu T, Li J, Jiang Y, Rohs R Biophys J. 2022; 121(20):3765-3767.

PMID: 36182667 PMC: 9674972. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.09.020.


Elucidating the biology of transcription factor-DNA interaction for accurate identification of cis-regulatory elements.

Hajheidari M, Huang S Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2022; 68:102232.

PMID: 35679803 PMC: 10103634. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102232.


References
1.
Slattery M, Zhou T, Yang L, Dantas Machado A, Gordan R, Rohs R . Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014; 39(9):381-99. PMC: 4149858. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.07.002. View

2.
NELSON H, Finch J, Luisi B, Klug A . The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987; 330(6145):221-6. DOI: 10.1038/330221a0. View

3.
Murakami K, Kimura M, Owens J, Meares C, Ishihama A . The two alpha subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase are asymmetrically arranged and contact different halves of the DNA upstream element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(5):1709-14. PMC: 19981. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1709. View

4.
Krissinel E, Henrick K . Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol. 2007; 372(3):774-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022. View

5.
Geszvain K, Gruber T, Mooney R, Gross C, Landick R . A hydrophobic patch on the flap-tip helix of E.coli RNA polymerase mediates sigma(70) region 4 function. J Mol Biol. 2004; 343(3):569-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.063. View