» Articles » PMID: 33205545

Bayesian Time-Series Models in Single Case Experimental Designs: A Tutorial for Trauma Researchers

Overview
Journal J Trauma Stress
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33205545
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) involve obtaining repeated measures from one or a few participants before, during, and, sometimes, after treatment implementation. Because they are cost-, time-, and resource-efficient and can provide robust causal evidence for more large-scale research, SCEDs are gaining popularity in trauma treatment research. However, sophisticated techniques to analyze SCED data remain underutilized. Herein, we discuss the utility of SCED data for trauma research, provide recommendations for addressing challenges specific to SCED approaches, and introduce a tutorial for two Bayesian models-the Bayesian interrupted time-series (BITS) model and the Bayesian unknown change-point (BUCP) model-that can be used to analyze the typically small sample, autocorrelated, SCED data. Software codes are provided for the ease of guiding readers in estimating these models. Analyses of a dataset from a published article as well as a trauma-specific simulated dataset are used to illustrate the models and demonstrate the interpretation of the results. We further discuss the implications of using such small-sample data-analytic techniques for SCEDs specific to trauma research.

Citing Articles

The BEHAVE application as a tool to monitor inclusive interventions for subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Merlo G, Chifari A, Chiazzese G, Denaro P, Firrera N, Savio N Front Psychol. 2023; 13:943370.

PMID: 36743629 PMC: 9889555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943370.


Defining and assessing immediacy in single-case experimental designs.

Manolov R, Onghena P J Exp Anal Behav. 2022; 118(3):462-492.

PMID: 36106573 PMC: 9825864. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.799.


Accurate models vs. accurate estimates: A simulation study of Bayesian single-case experimental designs.

Natesan Batley P, Hedges L Behav Res Methods. 2021; 53(4):1782-1798.

PMID: 33575987 PMC: 8367899. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01522-0.


Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs.

Natesan Batley P, Nandakumar R, Palka J, Shrestha P Front Psychol. 2021; 11:617047.

PMID: 33519641 PMC: 7843386. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617047.

References
1.
Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N . The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med. 2009; 28(25):3049-67. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3680. View

2.
Smith J . Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(4):510-50. PMC: 3652808. DOI: 10.1037/a0029312. View

3.
Harrington M, Velicer W . Comparing Visual and Statistical Analysis in Single-Case Studies Using Published Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2015; 50(2):162-83. PMC: 4677800. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2014.973989. View

4.
Shadish W, Sullivan K . Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(4):971-80. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y. View

5.
Bradley R, Greene J, Russ E, Dutra L, Westen D . A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162(2):214-27. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.214. View