» Articles » PMID: 33203866

Computationally Predicting Clinical Drug Combination Efficacy with Cancer Cell Line Screens and Independent Drug Action

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33203866
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence has recently emerged that many clinical cancer drug combinations may derive their efficacy from independent drug action (IDA), where patients only receive benefit from the single most effective drug in a drug combination. Here we present IDACombo, an IDA based method to predict the efficacy of drug combinations using monotherapy data from high-throughput cancer cell line screens. We show that IDACombo predictions closely agree with measured drug combination efficacies both in vitro (Pearson's correlation = 0.93 when comparing predicted efficacies to measured efficacies for >5000 combinations) and in a systematically selected set of clinical trials (accuracy > 84% for predicting statistically significant improvements in patient outcomes for 26 first line therapy trials). Finally, we demonstrate how IDACombo can be used to systematically prioritize combinations for development in specific cancer settings, providing a framework for quickly translating existing monotherapy cell line data into clinically meaningful predictions of drug combination efficacy.

Citing Articles

Scaling up drug combination surface prediction.

Huusari R, Wang T, Szedmak S, Dias D, Aittokallio T, Rousu J Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 40079263 PMC: 11904408. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf099.


Prediction of cancer cell line-specific synergistic drug combinations based on multi-omics data.

Chen J, Han H, Li L, Chen Z, Liu X, Li T PeerJ. 2025; 13:e19078.

PMID: 40028209 PMC: 11869890. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19078.


DD-PRiSM: a deep learning framework for decomposition and prediction of synergistic drug combinations.

Jin I, Lee S, Schmuhalek M, Nam H Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39800875 PMC: 11725392. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae717.


Discovery, Validation and Mechanistic Study of XPO1 Inhibition in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Paulson A, Gruener R, Lee A, Huang R Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682167 PMC: 11640544. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16233980.


A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level.

Vis D, Jaaks P, Aben N, Coker E, Barthorpe S, Beck A Cell Rep Med. 2024; 5(8):101687.

PMID: 39168097 PMC: 11384948. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687.


References
1.
Wangpaichitr M, Wu C, You M, Maher J, Dinh V, Feun L . N',N'-Dimethyl-N',N'-bis(phenylcarbonothioyl) Propanedihydrazide (Elesclomol) Selectively Kills Cisplatin Resistant Lung Cancer Cells through Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Cancers (Basel). 2010; 1(1):23-38. PMC: 2882109. DOI: 10.3390/cancers1010023. View

2.
Cantarovich F, BIZOLLON C, Cantarovich D, Lefrancois N, Dubernard J, Traeger J . Cyclosporine plasma levels six hours after oral administration. A useful tool for monitoring therapy. Transplantation. 1988; 45(2):389-94. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198802000-00029. View

3.
Basu A, Bodycombe N, Cheah J, Price E, Liu K, Schaefer G . An interactive resource to identify cancer genetic and lineage dependencies targeted by small molecules. Cell. 2013; 154(5):1151-1161. PMC: 3954635. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.003. View

4.
Menden M, Wang D, Mason M, Szalai B, Bulusu K, Guan Y . Community assessment to advance computational prediction of cancer drug combinations in a pharmacogenomic screen. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):2674. PMC: 6572829. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09799-2. View

5.
Vlahovic G, Karantza V, Wang D, Cosgrove D, Rudersdorf N, Yang J . A phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of ABT-263 in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2014; 32(5):976-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-014-0116-3. View