» Articles » PMID: 33203708

Comparison of Active Versus Passive Surveillance Adverse Event Reporting in a Paediatric Ambulatory Chiropractic Care Setting: a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ Open Qual
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33203708
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This pragmatic, cluster, stratified randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared the quantity and quality of adverse event (AE) reports after chiropractic manual therapy in children less than 14 years of age, using active versus passive surveillance reporting systems.

Method: Data were collected between November 2014 and July 2017 from 60 consecutive paediatric patient visits to participating chiropractors. Those allocated to active surveillance collected AE information with three paper-based questionnaires (two from patients, one from chiropractors) to identify any new or worsening symptoms after treatment. Passive surveillance involved AE information reported by chiropractors on a web-based system. To assess quality of reporting, AE reports greater than mild were reviewed by content experts. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of AE reports in active versus passive surveillance.

Results: Ninety-six chiropractors agreed to participate and enrolled in the study: 34 chiropractors in active surveillance with 1894 patient visits from 1179 unique patients and 35 chiropractors in passive surveillance with 1992 patient visits from 1363 unique patients. In the active arm, AEs were reported in 8.8% (n=140, 95% CI 6.72% to 11.18%) of patients/caregivers, compared with 0.1% (n=2, 95% CI 0.02% to 0.53%) in the passive arm (p<0.001). The quality of AE reports was not evaluated because the five AE reports reviewed by the content experts were determined to be of mild severity.

Conclusion: We found that active surveillance resulted in significantly more AE reports than passive surveillance. Further prospective active surveillance research studies should be conducted with children receiving chiropractic manual therapy to understand mechanisms and risk factors for moderate and severe AEs, and to further explore how and when to solicit patient safety information.

Citing Articles

What's the harm? Results of an active surveillance adverse event reporting system for chiropractors and physiotherapists.

Pohlman K, Funabashi M, OBeirne M, Cassidy J, Hill M, Hurwitz E PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309069.

PMID: 39159155 PMC: 11332930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309069.


Assessing adverse events associated with chiropractic care in preschool pediatric population: a feasibility study.

Dolbec A, Doucet C, Pohlman K, Sobczak S, Page I Chiropr Man Therap. 2024; 32(1):9.

PMID: 38481318 PMC: 10938841. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00529-0.


Prevalence & Risk Factors for Perinatal Stroke: A Population-Based Study.

Roy B, Webb A, Walker K, Morgan C, Badawi N, Nunez C Child Neurol Open. 2023; 10:2329048X231217691.

PMID: 38116020 PMC: 10729630. DOI: 10.1177/2329048X231217691.


Clinical Practice Guideline for Best Practice Management of Pediatric Patients by Chiropractors: Results of a Delphi Consensus Process.

Keating G, Hawk C, Amorin-Woods L, Amorin-Woods D, Vallone S, Farabaugh R J Integr Complement Med. 2023; 30(3):216-232.

PMID: 37902954 PMC: 10954607. DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0010.


Ten years of online incident reporting and learning using CPiRLS: implications for improved patient safety.

Thomas M, Swait G, Finch R Chiropr Man Therap. 2023; 31(1):9.

PMID: 36793096 PMC: 9933370. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00477-1.


References
1.
Witt C, Pach D, Brinkhaus B, Wruck K, Tag B, Mank S . Safety of acupuncture: results of a prospective observational study with 229,230 patients and introduction of a medical information and consent form. Forsch Komplementmed. 2009; 16(2):91-7. DOI: 10.1159/000209315. View

2.
Danova J, Kocourkova A, celko A . Active surveillance study of adverse events following immunisation of children in the Czech Republic. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):167. PMC: 5292794. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4083-4. View

3.
Cherkin D, Sherman K, Kahn J, Erro J, Deyo R, Haneuse S . Effectiveness of focused structural massage and relaxation massage for chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2009; 10:96. PMC: 2774684. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-96. View

4.
Thiel H, Bolton J, Docherty S, Portlock J . Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(21):2375-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557bb1. View

5.
Zelen M . A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979; 300(22):1242-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197905313002203. View