» Articles » PMID: 33203628

Level of Vital and Laboratory Values on Arrival, and Increased Risk of 7-day Mortality Among Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: a Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33203628
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to provide evidence for, at which vital and laboratory values, increased risk of 7-day mortality in acute adult patients on arrival to an emergency department (ED).

Design: A population-based cohort study.

Setting: ED at Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Participants: All patients ≥18 years with a first-time contact within the study period, 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2015.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was 7-day all-cause mortality.Variables were first recorded vital and laboratory values included in risk stratification scores; respiratory frequency, blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale, temperature, saturation, creatinine, PaO, platelet count and bilirubin. The association between values and mortality was described using a restricted cubic spline. A predefined 7-day mortality of 2.5% was chosen as a relevant threshold.

Results: We included 40 423 patients, 52.5% women, median age 57 (IQR 38-74) years and 7-day mortality 2.8%. Seven-day mortality of 2.5% had thresholds of respiratory frequency <12 and >18/min, systolic blood pressure <112 and >192 mm Hg, heart rate <54 and >102 beats/min, temperature <36.0°C and >39.8°C, saturation <97%, Glasgow Coma Scale score <15, creatinine <41 and >98 µmol/L for PaO <9.9 and >12.3 kPa, platelet count <165 and >327×10/L and bilirubin >12 µmol/L.

Conclusion: Vital values on arrival, outside the normal ranges for the measures, are indicative of increased risk of short-term mortality, and most of the value thresholds are included in the lowest urgency level in triage and risk stratification scoring systems.

Citing Articles

Ability of the National Early Warning Score and its respiratory and haemodynamic subcomponents to predict short-term mortality on general wards: a prospective three-centre observational study in Finland.

Loisa E, Kallonen A, Hoppu S, Tirkkonen J BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e055752.

PMID: 35473725 PMC: 9045111. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055752.


Age-adjusted interpretation of biomarkers of renal function and homeostasis, inflammation, and circulation in Emergency Department patients.

Candel B, Khoudja J, Gaakeer M, Avest E, Sir O, Lameijer H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):1556.

PMID: 35091652 PMC: 8799641. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05485-4.


Organ failure, aetiology and 7-day all-cause mortality among acute adult patients on arrival to an emergency department: a hospital-based cohort study.

Pedersen P, Henriksen D, Brabrand M, Lassen A Eur J Emerg Med. 2021; 28(6):448-455.

PMID: 34115711 PMC: 8549456. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000841.

References
1.
Farrohknia N, Castren M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H . Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:42. PMC: 3150303. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-42. View

2.
Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

3.
Hardie J, Vollmer W, Buist A, Ellingsen I, Morkve O . Reference values for arterial blood gases in the elderly. Chest. 2004; 125(6):2053-60. DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2053. View

4.
Franchini S, Scarallo L, Carlucci M, Cabrini L, Tresoldi M . SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? Clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU. Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 14(4):593-602. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0. View

5.
Carlsson L, Lind L, Larsson A . Reference values for 27 clinical chemistry tests in 70-year-old males and females. Gerontology. 2009; 56(3):259-65. DOI: 10.1159/000251722. View