» Articles » PMID: 33195587

Nutritional Quality, Voluntary Intake and Enteric Methane Emissions of Diets Based on Novel Cayman Grass and Its Associations With Two Shrub Legumes

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2020 Nov 16
PMID 33195587
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methane (CH) emissions from enteric fermentation in cattle are an important source of greenhouse gases, accounting for about 40% of all agricultural emissions. Diet quality plays a fundamental role in determining the magnitude of CH emissions. Specifically, the inclusion of feeds with high digestibility and nutritional value have been reported to be a viable option for reducing CH emissions and, simultaneously, increase animal productivity. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the nutritional composition and voluntary intake of diets based on tropical forages upon CH emissions from zebu steers. Five treatments (diets) were evaluated: Cay1: hybrid cv. Cayman (harvested after 65 days of regrowth: low quality); Cay2: cv. Cayman harvested after 45 days of regrowth; CayLl: cv. Cayman + ; CayLd: cv. Cayman + ; Hay: hay as a comparator of common naturalized pasture. For each diet representing different levels of intensification (naturalized pasture, improved pasture, and silvopastoral systems), CH emissions were measured using the polytunnel technique with four zebu steers housed in individual chambers. The CH accumulated was monitored using an infrared multigas analyzer, and the voluntary forage intake of each animal was calculated. Dry matter intake (DMI, % of body weight) ranged between 0.77 and 2.94 among diets offered. Emissions of CH per kg of DMI were significantly higher ( < ) in Cay1 (60.4 g), compared to other treatments. Diets that included forage legumes had generally higher crude protein contents and higher DMI. Cay1 and Hay which had low protein content and digestibility had a higher CH emission intensity (per unit live weight gain) compared to Cay2, CayLl and CayLd. Our results suggest that grass consumed after a regrowth period of 45 days results in lower CH emissions intensities compared to those observed following a regrowth period of 65 days. Diets with inclusion showed advantages in nutrient intake that are reflected in greater live weight gains of cattle. Consequently, the intensity of the emissions generated in the legume-based systems were lower suggesting that they are a good option for achieving the emission reduction goals of sustainable tropical cattle production.

Citing Articles

Effect of best bet methane abatement feed on feed intake, digestibility, live weight change, and methane emission in local Menz breed sheep in Ethiopia.

Bekele W, Zegeye A, Simachew A, Kobayashi N Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1538758.

PMID: 40027360 PMC: 11868066. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1538758.


Methane Emission of Italian Mediterranean Buffaloes Measured Using a Laser Detector During a Lactation Cycle.

Meo Zilio D, Iacurto M, Cenci F, Steri R Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765556 PMC: 11672828. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243652.


Enteric Methane Emission from Cattle Grazing Systems with Cover Crops and Legume-Grass Pasture.

Gere J, Restovich S, Mattera J, Cattoni M, Ortiz-Chura A, Posse G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682500 PMC: 11640361. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233535.


Long-term relationships of beef and dairy cattle and greenhouse gas emissions: Application of co-integrated panel models for Latin America.

Sandoval D, Junca Paredes J, Enciso Valencia K, Diaz Baca M, Bravo Parra A, Burkart S Heliyon. 2024; 10(1):e23364.

PMID: 38169786 PMC: 10758816. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23364.


Mixed success for carbon payments and subsidies in support of forest restoration in the neotropics.

Sinacore K, Garcia E, Finkral A, van Breugel M, Lopez O, Espinosa C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):8359.

PMID: 38102119 PMC: 10724297. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43861-4.


References
1.
Kurihara M, Magner T, Hunter R, McCrabb G . Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics. Br J Nutr. 1999; 81(3):227-34. View

2.
Patra A, Park T, Kim M, Yu Z . Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017; 8:13. PMC: 5270371. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-017-0145-9. View

3.
Makkar H, Strnad I, Mittendorfer J . Proficiency Testing of Feed Constituents: A Comparative Evaluation of European and Developing Country Laboratories and Its Implications for Animal Production. J Agric Food Chem. 2016; 64(41):7679-7687. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02452. View

4.
Dangal S, Tian H, Zhang B, Pan S, Lu C, Yang J . Methane emission from global livestock sector during 1890-2014: Magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal patterns. Glob Chang Biol. 2017; 23(10):4147-4161. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13709. View

5.
Krizsan S, Ahvenjarvi S, Huhtanen P . A meta-analysis of passage rate estimated by rumen evacuation with cattle and evaluation of passage rate prediction models. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(12):5890-901. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3457. View