» Articles » PMID: 33195265

Heterochronic Developmental Shifts Underlying Squamate Cerebellar Diversity Unveil the Key Features of Amniote Cerebellogenesis

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2020 Nov 16
PMID 33195265
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite a remarkable conservation of architecture and function, the cerebellum of vertebrates shows extensive variation in morphology, size, and foliation pattern. These features make this brain subdivision a powerful model to investigate the evolutionary developmental mechanisms underlying neuroanatomical complexity both within and between anamniote and amniote species. Here, we fill a major evolutionary gap by characterizing the developing cerebellum in two non-avian reptile species-bearded dragon lizard and African house snake-representative of extreme cerebellar morphologies and neuronal arrangement patterns found in squamates. Our data suggest that developmental strategies regarded as exclusive hallmark of birds and mammals, including transit amplification in an external granule layer (EGL) and Sonic hedgehog expression by underlying Purkinje cells (PCs), contribute to squamate cerebellogenesis independently from foliation pattern. Furthermore, direct comparison of our models suggests the key importance of spatiotemporal patterning and dynamic interaction between granule cells and PCs in defining cortical organization. Especially, the observed heterochronic shifts in early cerebellogenesis events, including upper rhombic lip progenitor activity and EGL maintenance, are strongly expected to affect the dynamics of molecular interaction between neuronal cell types in snakes. Altogether, these findings help clarifying some of the morphogenetic and molecular underpinnings of amniote cerebellar corticogenesis, but also suggest new potential molecular mechanisms underlying cerebellar complexity in squamates. Furthermore, squamate models analyzed here are revealed as key animal models to further understand mechanisms of brain organization.

Citing Articles

Transit Amplifying Progenitors in the Cerebellum: Similarities to and Differences from Transit Amplifying Cells in Other Brain Regions and between Species.

Miyashita S, Hoshino M Cells. 2022; 11(4).

PMID: 35203375 PMC: 8870322. DOI: 10.3390/cells11040726.


Incorporation of 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine into DNA and Proliferative Behavior of Cerebellar Neuroblasts: All That Glitters Is Not Gold.

Marti-Clua J Cells. 2021; 10(6).

PMID: 34200598 PMC: 8229392. DOI: 10.3390/cells10061453.

References
1.
Okuda H, Tatsumi K, Morita-Takemura S, Nakahara K, Nochioka K, Shinjo T . Hedgehog Signaling Modulates the Release of Gliotransmitters from Cultured Cerebellar Astrocytes. Neurochem Res. 2015; 41(1-2):278-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-015-1791-y. View

2.
Yopak K, Lisney T, Collin S, Montgomery J . Variation in brain organization and cerebellar foliation in chondrichthyans: sharks and holocephalans. Brain Behav Evol. 2007; 69(4):280-300. DOI: 10.1159/000100037. View

3.
Ollonen J, Da Silva F, Mahlow K, Di-Poi N . Skull Development, Ossification Pattern, and Adult Shape in the Emerging Lizard Model Organism : A Comparative Analysis With Other Squamates. Front Physiol. 2018; 9:278. PMC: 5882870. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00278. View

4.
Machold R, Fishell G . Math1 is expressed in temporally discrete pools of cerebellar rhombic-lip neural progenitors. Neuron. 2005; 48(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.028. View

5.
Carletti B, Williams I, Leto K, Nakajima K, Magrassi L, Rossi F . Time constraints and positional cues in the developing cerebellum regulate Purkinje cell placement in the cortical architecture. Dev Biol. 2008; 317(1):147-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.005. View