» Articles » PMID: 33193023

A Systematic Review of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Applications to Memory in Healthy Aging

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Nov 16
PMID 33193023
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has long been acknowledged that memory changes over the course of one's life, irrespective of diseases like dementia. Approaches to mitigate these changes have however yielded mixed results. Brain stimulation has been identified as one novel approach of augmenting older adult's memory. Thus far, such approaches have however been nuanced, targeting different memory domains with different methodologies. This has produced an amalgam of research with an unclear image overall. This systematic review therefore aims to clarify this landscape, evaluating, and interpreting available research findings in a coherent manner. A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted across Medline, PsycInfo, Psycarticles and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, which uncovered 44 studies employing non-invasive electrical brain stimulation in healthy older adults. All studies were of generally good quality spanning numerous memory domains. Within these, evidence was found for non-invasive brain stimulation augmenting working, episodic, associative, semantic, and procedural memory, with the first three domains having the greatest evidence base. Key sites for stimulation included the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), temporoparietal region, and primary motor cortex, with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) holding the greatest literature base. Inconsistencies within the literature are highlighted and interpreted, however this discussion was constrained by potential confounding variables within the literature, a risk of bias, and challenges defining research aims and results. Non-invasive brain stimulation often did however have a positive and predictable impact on older adult's memory, and thus warrants further research to better understand these effects.

Citing Articles

Microstructural and functional plasticity following repeated brain stimulation during cognitive training in older adults.

Antonenko D, Fromm A, Thams F, Grittner U, Meinzer M, Floel A Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):3184.

PMID: 37268628 PMC: 10238397. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38910-x.


Opposite pattern of transcranial direct current stimulation effects in middle-aged and older adults: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence.

Bagattini C, Cid-Fernandez S, Bulgari M, Miniussi C, Bortoletto M Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1087749.

PMID: 36761183 PMC: 9905246. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1087749.


Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.

Camacho-Conde J, Del Rosario Gonzalez-Bermudez M, Carretero-Rey M, Khan Z CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022; 29(1):8-23.

PMID: 36229994 PMC: 9804057. DOI: 10.1111/cns.13971.


Leveraging technology to personalize cognitive enhancement methods in aging.

Ziegler D, Anguera J, Gallen C, Hsu W, Wais P, Gazzaley A Nat Aging. 2022; 2(6):475-483.

PMID: 35873177 PMC: 9302894. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-022-00237-5.


Modulation of network centrality and gray matter microstructure using multi-session brain stimulation and memory training.

Thams F, Kulzow N, Floel A, Antonenko D Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(11):3416-3426.

PMID: 35373873 PMC: 9248322. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25857.


References
1.
Zammit A, Ezzati A, Zimmerman M, Lipton R, Lipton M, Katz M . Roles of hippocampal subfields in verbal and visual episodic memory. Behav Brain Res. 2016; 317:157-162. PMC: 6343125. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.038. View

2.
Cespon J, Rodella C, Rossini P, Miniussi C, Pellicciari M . Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Promotes Frontal Compensatory Mechanisms in Healthy Elderly Subjects. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018; 9:420. PMC: 5741680. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00420. View

3.
Sandrini M, Manenti R, Brambilla M, Cobelli C, Cohen L, Cotelli M . Older adults get episodic memory boosting from noninvasive stimulation of prefrontal cortex during learning. Neurobiol Aging. 2016; 39:210-216. PMC: 5108058. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.12.010. View

4.
Li L, Violante I, Leech R, Ross E, Hampshire A, Opitz A . Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 40(3):904-915. PMC: 6387619. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24420. View

5.
Rosen A, Prull M, OHara R, Race E, Desmond J, Glover G . Variable effects of aging on frontal lobe contributions to memory. Neuroreport. 2002; 13(18):2425-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00010. View