» Articles » PMID: 33192595

Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2020 Nov 16
PMID 33192595
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These analyses have been applied to CD8+ T cells, but quantitative analyses of other important markers and their correlations are limited. In this study, a digital pathology computational workflow is formulated for characterizing the spatial distributions of five immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3) and then the functionality is tested on whole slide images from patients with TNBC. The workflow is initiated by digital image processing to extract and colocalize immune marker-labeled cells and then convert this information to point patterns. Afterward invasive front (IF), central tumor (CT), and normal tissue (N) are characterized. For each region, we examine the intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The workflow is then repeated for all specimens to capture inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In this study, both intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneities are observed for all five markers across all specimens. Among all regions, IF tends to have higher densities of immune cells and overall larger variations in spatial model fitting parameters and higher density in cell clusters and hotspots compared to CT and N. Results suggest a distinct role of IF in the tumor immuno-architecture. Though the sample size is limited in the study, the computational workflow could be readily reproduced and scaled due to its automatic nature. Importantly, the value of the workflow also lies in its potential to be linked to treatment outcomes and identification of predictive biomarkers for responders/non-responders, and its application to parameterization and validation of computational immuno-oncology models.

Citing Articles

AI-Assisted High-Throughput Tissue Microarray Workflow.

Kurowski K, Timme S, Foll M, Backhaus C, Holzner P, Bengsch B Methods Protoc. 2024; 7(6).

PMID: 39728616 PMC: 11678066. DOI: 10.3390/mps7060096.


Deciphering cell to cell spatial relationship for pathology images using SpatialQPFs.

Li X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29585.

PMID: 39609630 PMC: 11605059. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81383-1.


Spatial Architecture of Single-Cell and Vasculature in Tumor Microenvironment Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Mi H, Varadhan R, Cimino-Mathews A, Emens L, Santa-Maria C, Popel A Mod Pathol. 2024; 38(2):100652.

PMID: 39522644 PMC: 11845302. DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100652.


Automated scoring methods for quantitative interpretation of Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Baharun N, Adam A, Zailani M, Rajpoot N, Xu Q, Md Zin R BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1202.

PMID: 39350098 PMC: 11440723. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12962-8.


A novel histopathological feature of spatial tumor-stroma distribution predicts lung squamous cell carcinoma prognosis.

Taki T, Koike Y, Adachi M, Sakashita S, Sakamoto N, Kojima M Cancer Sci. 2024; 115(11):3804-3816.

PMID: 39226222 PMC: 11531967. DOI: 10.1111/cas.16244.


References
1.
Lianyuan T, Dianrong X, Chunhui Y, Zhaolai M, Bin J . The predictive value and role of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Cancer Biol Ther. 2018; 19(4):296-305. PMC: 5902243. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1416932. View

2.
Bai J, Earp J, Pillai V . Translational Quantitative Systems Pharmacology in Drug Development: from Current Landscape to Good Practices. AAPS J. 2019; 21(4):72. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0339-5. View

3.
Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, van Diest P . Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives. Histopathology. 2011; 61(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03814.x. View

4.
Norton K, Wallace T, Pandey N, Popel A . An agent-based model of triple-negative breast cancer: the interplay between chemokine receptor CCR5 expression, cancer stem cells, and hypoxia. BMC Syst Biol. 2017; 11(1):68. PMC: 5504656. DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0445-x. View

5.
Halama N, Michel S, Kloor M, Zoernig I, Benner A, Spille A . Localization and density of immune cells in the invasive margin of human colorectal cancer liver metastases are prognostic for response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(17):5670-7. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0268. View