» Articles » PMID: 33188900

Epicardial Course of the Septopulmonary Bundle: Anatomical Considerations and Clinical Implications for Roof Line Completion

Abstract

Background: Gaps in the roof line have been ascribed to epicardial conduction using the septopulmonary bundle.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the frequency of septopulmonary bundle bypass during roof line ablation, to describe anatomical conditions favoring this epicardial gap, and to propose an alternative strategy when present.

Methods: One hundred consecutive patients underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. A de novo roof line was created between the superior pulmonary veins. In cases of residual gaps, a floor line was created between the inferior pulmonary veins. Microtomography imaging and histological analyses of 5 human donor hearts were performed: a specific focus was made on the dome and the posterior wall.

Results: Residual gaps were more frequent in roof lines than floor lines (33% vs 15%; P = .049). Electrogram morphologies, activation sequences, and pacing maneuvers indicated an epicardial bypass of the roof line in all cases. Conduction block was obtained in 67 roof lines and 28 floor lines, resulting in a 95% success rate of linear block, without "box" isolation. Between the superior pulmonary veins, the atrial myocardium was thicker and consistently displayed adipose tissue separating the septopulmonary bundle from the septoatrial bundle.

Conclusion: Epicardial conduction across the roof line is common and requires careful electrogram analysis to detect. In such cases, a floor line can be an effective alternative strategy, with clear validation criteria. Myocardial thickness and fat interposition may explain difficulties in achieving lesion transmurality during roof line ablation.

Citing Articles

The relationship between the 3D electroanatomical mapping parameters of the left atrial posterior wall and the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Chen Y, Zhuang J, Li X, Zhang C, Cao X, Xu Z Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1522807.

PMID: 40027511 PMC: 11868116. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522807.


Extended Period Outcomes of Posterior Box Isolation in 4 Randomized Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Trials.

Lee S, Yu H, Choi S, Kim D, Kim T, Uhm J JACC Asia. 2025; 5(2):285-295.

PMID: 39967220 PMC: 11840270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.002.


Differentiation between epicardial and endocardial conduction gaps for left atrial posterior wall isolation using peak frequency annotation algorithm.

Suga K, Kato H, Murakami H, Yanagisawa S, Inden Y, Murohara T HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025; 10(12):912-916.

PMID: 39897675 PMC: 11781886. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.08.028.


Comparison of ex vivo lesion formation for two adjacent radiofrequency applications with very high-power short-duration in various inter-lesion times.

Hanaki Y, Komatsu Y, Iioka Y, Ishizu T, Nogami A J Arrhythm. 2025; 41(1):e13192.

PMID: 39816994 PMC: 11730985. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13192.


Usefulness of peak frequency in Electrograms for elimination of left atrial Posterior Wall residual potentials via Epicardial connections.

Ishikura M, Kawase Y, Kamiya H, Miyake T, Matsuo H J Arrhythm. 2025; 41(1):e13183.

PMID: 39816993 PMC: 11730724. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13183.