» Articles » PMID: 33187306

Development of a Prediction Model to Identify Children at Risk of Future Developmental Delay at Age 4 in a Population-Based Setting

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Nov 14
PMID 33187306
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our aim was to develop a prediction model for infants from the general population, with easily obtainable predictors, that accurately predicts risk of future developmental delay at age 4 and then assess its performance. Longitudinal cohort data were used ( = 1983), including full-term and preterm children. Development at age 4 was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. Candidate predictors included perinatal and parental factors as well as growth and developmental milestones during the first two years. We applied multiple logistic regression with backwards selection and internal validation, and we assessed calibration and discriminative performance (i.e., area under the curve (AUC)). The model was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity at several cut-off values. The final model included sex, maternal educational level, pre-existing maternal obesity, several milestones (smiling, speaking 2-3 word sentences, standing) and weight for height z score at age 1. The fit was good, and the discriminative performance was high (AUC: 0.837). Sensitivity and specificity were 73% and 80% at a cut-off probability of 10%. Our model is promising for use as a prediction tool in community-based settings. It could aid to identify infants in early life (age 2) with increased risk of future developmental problems at age 4 that may benefit from early interventions.

Citing Articles

Predicting neurodevelopmental disorders using machine learning models and electronic health records - status of the field.

Rajagopalan S, Tammimies K J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):63.

PMID: 39548397 PMC: 11566279. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09579-0.


Predictors of early child development for screening pregnant women most in need of support in Brazil.

Viegas da Silva E, Hartwig F, Melo Santos T, Yousafzai A, Santos I, Barros A J Glob Health. 2024; 14:04143.

PMID: 39173149 PMC: 11341113. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04143.

References
1.
Kallen K, Serenius F, Westgren M, Marsal K . Impact of obstetric factors on outcome of extremely preterm births in Sweden: prospective population-based observational study (EXPRESS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94(11):1203-14. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12726. View

2.
McCormick M, Brooks-Gunn J, Buka S, Goldman J, Yu J, Salganik M . Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the Infant Health and Development Program. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(3):771-80. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1316. View

3.
Fredriks A, Buuren S, Burgmeijer R, Meulmeester J, Beuker R, Brugman E . Continuing positive secular growth change in The Netherlands 1955-1997. Pediatr Res. 2000; 47(3):316-23. DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200003000-00006. View

4.
Anderson L, Shinn C, Fullilove M, Scrimshaw S, Fielding J, Normand J . The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24(3 Suppl):32-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00655-4. View

5.
Potijk M, Kerstjens J, Bos A, Reijneveld S, de Winter A . Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children with low socioeconomic status: risks multiply. J Pediatr. 2013; 163(5):1289-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.001. View