» Articles » PMID: 33184374

Better Continuity of Care Improves the Quality of End-of-life Care Among Elderly Patients with End-stage Renal Disease

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Nov 13
PMID 33184374
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Continuity of care (COC) has been emphasized in research on terminal cancer patients to increase the quality of end-of-life care; however, limited research has been conducted on end-stage renal disease patients. We applied a retrospective cohort design on 29,095 elderly patients with end-stage renal disease who died between 2005 and 2013. These patients were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The provider Continuity of Care Index (COCI) and site COCI were calculated on the basis of outpatient visits during the 6-12 months before death. We discovered that increases in the provider COCI were significantly associated with reductions in health expenditures after adjusting for confounders, especially in inpatient and emergency departments, where the treatment intensity is high. Higher provider and site COC were also associated with lower utilization of acute care and invasive treatments in the last month before death. Provider COC had a greater effect on end-of-life care expenditures than site COC did, which indicated significant care coordination gaps within the same facility. Our findings support the recommendation of prioritizing the continuity of end-of-life care, especially provider continuity, for patients with end-stage renal disease.

Citing Articles

End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Kidney Failure on Maintenance Dialysis: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.

Hafid S, Isenberg S, Fernandes A, Gallagher E, Webber C, Joseph M Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024; 11:20543581241280698.

PMID: 39315345 PMC: 11418337. DOI: 10.1177/20543581241280698.


Psychosocial functioning in individuals with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a mixed methods systematic review.

Ghiglieri C, Dempster M, Wright S, Graham-Wisener L BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):164.

PMID: 37891568 PMC: 10612179. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01288-0.


Dying with end stage kidney disease: factors associated with place of death on a palliative care program.

Cunha Rodrigues A, David F, Guedes R, Rocha C, Oliveira H J Bras Nefrol. 2023; 46(1):93-97.

PMID: 37870397 PMC: 10962416. DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2023-0015en.


Continuity of care and treatment intensity at the end of life in Swiss cancer patients.

Bahler C, Napflin M, Scherer M, Blozik E Eur J Public Health. 2023; 33(3):396-402.

PMID: 37029913 PMC: 10234661. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad047.


Association between continuity of care (COC), healthcare use and costs: what can we learn from claims data? A rapid review.

Nicolet A, Al-Gobari M, Perraudin C, Wagner J, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Marti J BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):658.

PMID: 35578226 PMC: 9112559. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07953-z.


References
1.
Pu C, Chou Y . The impact of continuity of care on emergency room use in a health care system without referral management: an instrumental variable approach. Ann Epidemiol. 2016; 26(3):183-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.12.007. View

2.
Mainous 3rd A, Gill J . The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician?. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(10):1539-41. PMC: 1508474. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1539. View

3.
Teno J, Gozalo P, Trivedi A, Bunker J, Lima J, Ogarek J . Site of Death, Place of Care, and Health Care Transitions Among US Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000-2015. JAMA. 2018; 320(3):264-271. PMC: 6076888. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.8981. View

4.
Bayliss E, Ellis J, Shoup J, Zeng C, McQuillan D, Steiner J . Effect of continuity of care on hospital utilization for seniors with multiple medical conditions in an integrated health care system. Ann Fam Med. 2015; 13(2):123-9. PMC: 4369605. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1739. View

5.
Anderson W, Goldstein N . Update in hospice and palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2012; 15(2):236-41. PMC: 3280591. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0449. View